Show item record

dc.contributor.authorHaustein, Stefanie
dc.contributor.authorLarivière, Vincent
dc.contributor.authorThelwall, Mike
dc.contributor.authorAmyot, Didier
dc.contributor.authorPeters, Isabella
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-14T18:23:32Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2020-04-14T18:23:32Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/23260
dc.publisherOldenbourg Verlagfr
dc.subjectAltmetricsfr
dc.subjectSocial mediafr
dc.subjectTwitterfr
dc.subjectMendeleyfr
dc.subjectCitation analysisfr
dc.subjectScholarly communicationfr
dc.titleTweets vs. Mendeley readers : how do these two social media metrics differ?fr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l'informationfr
dcterms.abstractA set of 1.4 million biomedical papers was analyzed with regards to how often articles are mentioned on Twitter or saved by users on Mendeley. While Twitter is a microblogging platform used by a general audience to distribute information, Mendeley is a reference manager targeted at an academic user group to organize scholarly literature. Both platforms are used as sources for so-called “altmetrics” to measure a new kind of research impact. This analysis shows in how far they differ and compare to traditional citation impact metrics based on a large set of PubMed papers.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1611-2776fr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposantTweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ? Haustein, S., Larivière, V., Thelwall, M., Amyot, D. Peters, I. (2014). Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ? IT – Information Technology, 56(5): 207-215.fr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscriptfr
oaire.citationTitleInformation technology
oaire.citationVolume56
oaire.citationIssue5
oaire.citationStartPage207
oaire.citationEndPage215


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.