Tweets vs. Mendeley readers : how do these two social media metrics differ?
dc.contributor.author | Haustein, Stefanie | |
dc.contributor.author | Larivière, Vincent | |
dc.contributor.author | Thelwall, Mike | |
dc.contributor.author | Amyot, Didier | |
dc.contributor.author | Peters, Isabella | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-14T18:23:32Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | fr |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-14T18:23:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/23260 | |
dc.publisher | Oldenbourg Verlag | fr |
dc.subject | Altmetrics | fr |
dc.subject | Social media | fr |
dc.subject | fr | |
dc.subject | Mendeley | fr |
dc.subject | Citation analysis | fr |
dc.subject | Scholarly communication | fr |
dc.title | Tweets vs. Mendeley readers : how do these two social media metrics differ? | fr |
dc.type | Article | fr |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Université de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l'information | fr |
dcterms.abstract | A set of 1.4 million biomedical papers was analyzed with regards to how often articles are mentioned on Twitter or saved by users on Mendeley. While Twitter is a microblogging platform used by a general audience to distribute information, Mendeley is a reference manager targeted at an academic user group to organize scholarly literature. Both platforms are used as sources for so-called “altmetrics” to measure a new kind of research impact. This analysis shows in how far they differ and compare to traditional citation impact metrics based on a large set of PubMed papers. | fr |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:1611-2776 | fr |
dcterms.language | eng | fr |
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposant | Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ? Haustein, S., Larivière, V., Thelwall, M., Amyot, D. Peters, I. (2014). Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ? IT – Information Technology, 56(5): 207-215. | fr |
UdeM.VersionRioxx | Version acceptée / Accepted Manuscript | fr |
oaire.citationTitle | Information technology | |
oaire.citationVolume | 56 | |
oaire.citationIssue | 5 | |
oaire.citationStartPage | 207 | |
oaire.citationEndPage | 215 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.