Using the dual-criteria methods to supplement visual inspection: An analysis of nonsimulated data
Dual-criteria methods 1
Article [Accepted Manuscript]
Is part ofJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis ; vol. 50, no 3, p.662-667
The purpose of our study was to examine the probability of observing false positives in non-simulated data using the dual-criteria methods. We extracted data from published studies to produce a series of 16,927 datasets and then assessed the proportion of false positives for various phase lengths. Our results indicate that collecting at least 3 data points in the first phase (Phase A) and at least 5 data points in the second phase (Phase B) is generally sufficient to produce acceptable levels of false positives.
Lanovaz, M. J., Huxley, S. C., & Dufour, M.-M. (2017). Using the dual-criteria methods to supplement visual inspection: An analysis of nonsimulated data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 662-667. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.394