Liens externes
  • Directories
  • Faculties
  • Libraries
  • Campus maps
  • Sites A to Z
  • My UdeM
    • Mon portail UdeM
    • My email
    • StudiUM
Dessin du pavillon Roger Gaudry/Sketch of Roger Gaudry Building
University Home pageUniversity Home pageUniversity Home page
Papyrus : Institutional Repository
Papyrus
Institutional Repository
Papyrus
    • français
    • English
  • English 
    • français
    • English
  • Login
  • English 
    • français
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Faculté des arts et des sciences
  • Faculté des arts et des sciences – École de psychoéducation
  • Faculté des arts et des sciences – École de psychoéducation – Travaux et publications
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Faculté des arts et des sciences
  • Faculté des arts et des sciences – École de psychoéducation
  • Faculté des arts et des sciences – École de psychoéducation – Travaux et publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

My Account

To submit an item or subscribe to email alerts.
Login
New user?

Browse

All of PapyrusCommunities and CollectionsTitlesIssue DatesAuthorsAdvisorsSubjectsDisciplinesAffiliationTitles indexThis CollectionTitlesIssue DatesAuthorsAdvisorsSubjectsDisciplinesAffiliationTitles index

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
Show metadata
Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/1866/19838

Using single-case experiments to support evidence-based decisions : how much is enough?

Single-case experimental designs

Article [Accepted Manuscript]
Thumbnail
Lanovaz & Rapp (2016) self-archive.pdf (419.9Kb)
Is part of
Behavior modification ; vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 377-395.
Publisher(s)
Sage
2016
Author(s)
Lanovaz, Marc
Rapp, John T.
Affiliation
  • Université de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. École de psychoéducation
Keywords
  • Empirically supported treatments
  • Evidence-based practice
  • External validity
  • Replication
  • Single-case experimental designs
Abstract(s)
For practitioners, the use of single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) in the research literature raises an important question: How many single-case experiments are enough to have sufficient confidence that an intervention will be effective with an individual from a given population? Although standards have been proposed to address this question, current guidelines do not appear to be strongly grounded in theory or empirical research. The purpose of our article is to address this issue by presenting guidelines to facilitate evidence-based decisions by adopting a simple statistical approach to quantify the support for interventions that have been validated using SCEDs. Specifically, we propose the use of success rates as a supplement to support evidence-based decisions. The proposed methodology allows practitioners to aggregate the results from single-case experiments to estimate the probability that a given intervention will produce a successful outcome. We also discuss considerations and limitations associated with this approach.
Other location(s)
https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445515613584
Collections
  • Faculté des arts et des sciences – École de psychoéducation – Travaux et publications [138]

DSpace software [version 5.8 XMLUI], copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Certificat SSL / SSL Certificate
les bibliothéques/UdeM
  • Emergency
  • Private life
  • Careers
  • My email
  • StudiUM
  • iTunes U
  • Contact us
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • University RSS
 

 


DSpace software [version 5.8 XMLUI], copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Certificat SSL / SSL Certificate
les bibliothéques/UdeM
  • Emergency
  • Private life
  • Careers
  • My email
  • StudiUM
  • iTunes U
  • Contact us
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • University RSS