Show item record

dc.contributor.authorRosen, Natalie O.
dc.contributor.authorBergeron, Sophie
dc.contributor.authorSadikaj, Gentiana
dc.contributor.authorGlowacka, Maria
dc.contributor.authorDelisle, Isabelle
dc.contributor.authorBaxter, Mary-Lou
dc.subjectProvoked vestibulodyniafr
dc.subjectSexual functionfr
dc.subjectPartner responsesfr
dc.titleImpact of male partner responses on sexual function in women with vulvodynia and their partners: a dyadic daily experience study
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre de recherche interdisciplinaire sur les problèmes conjugaux et les agressions sexuellesfr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département de psychologiefr
UdeM.statutProfesseur(e) / Professorfr
dcterms.abstractObjective: There is a paucity of research investigating the role of interpersonal variables in vulvodynia—a prevalent, chronic, vulvo-vaginal pain condition that negatively affects many aspects of women’s sexual health, emotional well-being and intimate relationships. Cross-sectional studies have shown that male partner responses to painful intercourse are associated with pain and sexual satisfaction in women with vulvodynia. Partner responses can be solicitous (attention and sympathy), negative (hostility and frustration), and facilitative (encouragement of adaptive coping). No research has assessed the influence of daily partner responses in this population. Further, there is limited knowledge regarding the impact of partner responses on sexual function, which is a key measure of impairment in vulvodynia. Methods: Using daily diaries, 66 women (M age = 27.91, SD = 5.94) diagnosed with vulvodynia and their cohabiting male partners (M age = 30.00, SD = 8.33) reported on male partner responses and sexual function on days when sexual intercourse occurred (M = 6.54, SD = 4.99). Drawing on the Actor-Partner Interdependence model (APIM), a multivariate multilevel modeling approach was adopted. Results: A woman’s sexual functioning improved on days when she perceived greater facilitative and lower solicitous and negative male partner responses, and when her male partner reported lower solicitous responses. A man’s sexual functioning was poorer on days when he reported greater solicitous and negative responses. Conclusions: Findings suggest that facilitative male partner responses may improve sexual functioning whereas solicitous and negative responses may be detrimental. Partner responses should be targeted in psychological interventions aimed to improve the sexual functioning of affected
dcterms.descriptionNote de l'éditeur : This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record. / Cet article ne constitue pas la version officielle, et peut différer de la version publiée dans la revue.
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscript
oaire.citationTitleHealth psychology

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.