Show item record

dc.contributor.authorAwada, Nayla
dc.contributor.authorBergeron, Sophie
dc.contributor.authorSteben, Marc
dc.contributor.authorHainault, Victoria-Ann
dc.contributor.authorMcDuff, Pierre
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-23T19:09:28Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2016-02-23T19:09:28Z
dc.date.issued2014-05
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/13155
dc.subjectProvoked vestibulodyniafr
dc.subjectAmbivalence over emotional expressionfr
dc.subjectDyadicfr
dc.subjectVulvodyniafr
dc.subjectCouplesfr
dc.subjectSexualityfr
dc.titleTo say or not to say : dyadic ambivalence over emotional expression and its associations with pain, sexuality, and distress in couples coping with provoked vestibulodynia
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département de psychologiefr
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre de recherche interdisciplinaire sur les problèmes conjugaux et les agressions sexuellesfr
UdeM.statutProfesseur(e) / Professorfr
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jsm.12463
dcterms.abstractIntroduction Provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) is a highly prevalent and taxing female genital pain condition. Despite the intimate nature of this pain and the fact that affective factors such as anxiety have been shown to modulate its manifestations, no study has yet explored the emotional regulation of couples in which the woman suffers from PVD. Aim Ambivalence over emotional expression (AEE) is an emotional regulation variable that quantifies the extent to which a person is comfortable with the way she or he expresses emotions. We examined whether the dyadic AEE of couples in which the woman suffers from PVD was differentially associated with women's pain and couples' psychological, sexual, and relational functioning. Methods Couples (N = 254), in which the woman suffered from PVD, completed the AEE questionnaire. A couple typology of dyadic AEE was created. Main Outcome Measures Dependent measures for both members of the couple were the global measure of sexual satisfaction scale, the Beck depression inventory II, and the revised dyadic adjustment scale. The female sexual function index and the sexual history form were used to assess the sexual function of women and men, respectively. Women also completed the pain rating index of the McGill pain questionnaire. Results Couples, in which both partners were considered low on AEE, had the highest scores on sexual satisfaction (P = 0.02) and function (P < 0.01), the lowest depression scores (P < 0.01), and the best dyadic adjustment (P = 0.02). No difference in pain intensity was found between couples. Conclusions Findings suggest that, for couples in which the woman suffers from PVD, an emotional regulation that is low in ambivalence in both partners is associated with better psychological, sexual, and relational outcomes. Results indicate that emotional regulation may be important to consider in the assessment and treatment of couples coping with PVD.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1743-6095
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscript
oaire.citationTitleJournal of sexual medicine
oaire.citationVolume11
oaire.citationIssue5
oaire.citationStartPage1271
oaire.citationEndPage1282


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.