Show item record

dc.contributor.authorDe Jong, Jacqueline
dc.contributor.authorBurkhard, Fiona
dc.contributor.authorZwahlen, Marcel
dc.contributor.authorJunginger, Baerbel
dc.contributor.authorDumoulin, Chantal
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-12T13:13:24Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2024-08-12T13:13:24Z
dc.date.issued2024-02-08
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/33709
dc.publisherSpringerfr
dc.rightsCe document est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Paternité 4.0 International. / This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleAssessment of involuntary PFM contractions in comparison with existing literature and IUGA/ICS terminology reportsfr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté de médecine. École de réadaptationfr
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00192-024-05729-z
dcterms.abstractIntroduction and Hypothesis Involuntary pelvic floor muscle (PFM) contractions are thought to occur during an increase in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). Although no studies have assessed their presence in women with normal pelvic floor (PF) function, existing literature links the absence of involuntary PFM contractions to various PF dysfunctions. This study rectifies this lacuna by evaluating involuntary PFM contractions during IAP in healthy nulliparous women with no PF dysfunction, using visual observation and vaginal palpation. Results were compared with the literature and the IUGA/ICS Terminology Reports. Methods Nulliparous (n=149) women performed three sets of three maximal coughs. Visual observation and vaginal palpation were conducted in the standing and supine positions. The women were not instructed to contract their PFMs. Occurrence rates were calculated for each assessment method and position; differences between positions were analyzed using the Chi-squared test. Results Rates of occurrence of involuntary PFM contraction were low across both assessments and positions (5–17%). Significant differences were found between standing (5%) and supine (15%) positions for visual observation, but not vaginal palpation (15%, 17% respectively). Occurrence rates also differed compared with the literature and terminology reports. Conclusions Contrary to clinical expectations, rates of occurrence of involuntary PFM contraction among our cohort of nulliparous women were extremely low. Digital palpation results showed high agreement with the terminology reports, but only partial agreement was observed for the visual observation results. Our study underscores the need for more research aimed at defining normal involuntary PF functions, a review of our understanding of involuntary PFM contractions, and better standardized guidelines for involuntary PFM assessment methods.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:0937-3462fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1433-3023fr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposantdoi:10.1007/s00192-024-05729-zfr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion publiée / Version of Recordfr
oaire.citationTitleInternational urogynecology journalfr
oaire.citationVolume35fr
oaire.citationStartPage823fr
oaire.citationEndPage830fr


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

Ce document est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Paternité 4.0 International. / This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Usage rights : Ce document est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Paternité 4.0 International. / This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.