Show item record

dc.contributor.authorBrisebois, Amélie
dc.contributor.authorBrambati, Simona Maria
dc.contributor.authorJutras, Claudie
dc.contributor.authorRochon, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorLeonard, Carol
dc.contributor.authorZumbansen, Anna
dc.contributor.authorAnglade, Carole
dc.contributor.authorMarcotte, Karine
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-17T17:55:51Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2024-01-17T17:55:51Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-27
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/32397
dc.publisherAmerican Speech-Language-Hearing Associationfr
dc.titleAdaptation and reliability of the Cinderella story retell task in Canadian French persons without brain injuryfr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté de médecine. École d'orthophonie et d'audiologiefr
dc.identifier.doi10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00101
dcterms.abstractPurpose: Main concept (MC) analysis is a well-documented method of discourse analysis in adults with and without brain injury. This study aims to develop a MC checklist that is culturally and linguistically adapted for Canadian French speakers and examine its reliability. We also documented microstructural properties and provide a normative reference in persons not brain injured (PNBIs). Method: Discourse samples from 43 PNBIs were collected. All participants completed the Cinderella story retell task twice. Manual transcription was performed for all samples. The 34 MCs for the Cinderella story retell task were adapted into Canadian French and used to score all transcripts. In addition, microstructural variables were extracted using Computerized Language Analysis (CLAN). Intraclass correlation coefficients were computed to assess interrater reliability for MC codes and microstructural variables. Test–retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlations, Spearman's rho correlations, and the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test. Bland–Altman plots were used to examine the agreement of the discourse measures between the two sessions. Results: The MC checklist for the Cinderella story retell task adapted for Canadian French speakers is provided. Good-to-excellent interrater reliability was obtained for most MC codes; however, reliability ranged from poor to excellent for the “inaccurate and incomplete” code. Microstructural variables demonstrated excellent interrater reliability. Test–retest reliability ranged from poor to excellent for all variables, with the majority falling between moderate and excellent. Bland–Altman plots illustrated the limits of agreement between test and retest. Conclusions: This study provides the MC checklist for clinicians and researchers working with Canadian French speakers when assessing discourse with the Cinderella story retell task. It also addresses the gap in available psychometric data regarding test–retest reliability in PNBIs.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1058-0360fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1558-9110fr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposantDOI: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00101fr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscriptfr
oaire.citationTitleAmerican journal of speech-language pathologyfr
oaire.citationVolume32fr
oaire.citationIssue6fr
oaire.citationStartPage2871fr
oaire.citationEndPage2888fr


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.