Show item record

dc.contributor.authorTurpin, Nicolas A.
dc.contributor.authorMartinez, Romain
dc.contributor.authorBegon, Mickaël
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-17T11:41:39Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2023-04-17T11:41:39Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-14
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/27750
dc.publisherSpringerfr
dc.subjectElectromyographyfr
dc.subjectEccentricfr
dc.subjectErgonomicsfr
dc.subjectShoulder injuriesfr
dc.subjectMusculoskeletalfr
dc.subjectIntramuscularfr
dc.titleShoulder muscle activation strategies differ when lifting or lowering a loadfr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté de médecine. École de kinésiologie et des sciences de l'activité physiquefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de la Réunion. UFR Sciences de l'homme et de l'environnement. Sciences et techniques des activités physiques et sportivesfr
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00421-020-04464-9
dcterms.abstractPurpose Lowering a load could be associated with abnormal shoulder and scapular motion. We tested the hypothesis that lowering a load involves different shoulder muscle coordination strategies compared to lifting a load. Methods EMG activity of 13 muscles was recorded in 30 healthy volunteers who lifted and lowered a 6, 12 or 18 kg box between three shelves. Kinematics, EMG levels and muscle synergies, extracted using non-negative matrix factorization, were analyzed. Results We found greater muscle activity level during lowering in four muscles (+ 1–2% MVC in anterior deltoid, biceps brachii, serratus anterior and pectoralis major). The movements were performed faster during lifting (18.2 vs. 15.9 cm/s) but with similar hand paths and segment kinematics. The number of synergies was the same in both tasks. Two synergies were identified in ~ 75% of subjects, and one synergy in the others. Synergy #1 mainly activated prime movers’ muscles, while synergy #2 co-activated several antagonist muscles. Synergies’ structure was similar between lifting and lowering (Pearson’s r ≈ 0.9 for synergy #1 and 0.7–08 for synergy #2). Synergy #2 was more activated during lowering and explained the greater activity observed in anterior deltoid, serratus anterior and pectoralis. Conclusion Lifting and lowering a load were associated with similar synergy structure. In 3/4 of subjects, lowering movements involved greater activation of a “multiple antagonists” synergy. The other subjects co-contracted all shoulder muscles as a unit in both conditions. These inter-individual differences should be investigated in the occurrence of shoulder musculoskeletal disorders.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1439-6319fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1439-6327fr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposantTurpin, N.A., Martinez, R. & Begon, M. Shoulder muscle activation strategies differ when lifting or lowering a load. Eur J Appl Physiol 120, 2417–2429 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04464-9fr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscriptfr
oaire.citationTitleEuropean journal of applied physiologyfr
oaire.citationVolume120fr
oaire.citationStartPage2417fr
oaire.citationEndPage2429fr


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.