Show item record

dc.contributor.authorCourteau, Émilie
dc.contributor.authorLoignon, Guillaume
dc.contributor.authorSteinhauer, Karsten
dc.contributor.authorRoyle, Phaedra
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T13:38:28Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2023-01-31T13:38:28Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-04
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/27372
dc.publisherAmerican Speech-Language-Hearing Associationfr
dc.titleIdentifying linguistic markers of French-speaking teenagers with developmental language disorder : which tasks matter?fr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté de médecine. École d'orthophonie et d'audiologiefr
dc.identifier.doi10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00541
dcterms.abstractPurpose:This research aimed to identify reliable tasks discriminating French-speaking adolescents with developmental language disorder (DLD) from theirpeers with typical language (TL) and to assess which linguistic domains repre-sent areas of particular weakness in DLD. Unlike English, morphosyntax has notbeen identified as a special area of weakness when compared with lexicose-mantics in French preschoolers with DLD. Since there is evidence that subject–verb number agreement is consolidated in later childhood, one might expectmorphosyntax to be a particular weakness and marker of French DLD only in(pre)adolescence.Method:We administered 20 subtasks that assessed linguistic and phonolo-gical working memory skills of two groups: 17 adolescents clinically identifiedas having DLD (M= 14.1 years) and 20 (pre)teens with TL (M= 12.2 years).Using robust statistics that are less affected by outliers, we selected the mostdiscriminating subtasks between our groups, calculated their optimal cutoffscore, and derived diagnostic accuracy statistics. We combined these subtasksin a multivariable model to identify which subtasks contributed the most to theidentification of DLD.Results:Seven subtasks were selected as discriminating between our groups,and three showed outstanding diagnostic accuracy: Recalling Sentences, a multi-word task assessing lexicosemantic skills, and a subject–verb number agreementproduction task. When combined, we found that the latter contributed the mostto our multivariable model.Conclusion:This study provides evidence that the most relevant markers toidentify DLD in French teenagers are tasks assessing lexicosemantics and mor-phosyntactic domains, and that morphosyntax should be considered an impor-tant area of weakness in French-speaking teenagers with DLD.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1092-4388fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1558-9102fr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposantCourteau, É., Loignon, G., Steinhauer, K., & Royle, P. (2023). Identifying linguistic markers of French-speaking teenagers with developmental language disorder: Which tasks matter? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 66(1), 221–238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00541fr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion publiée / Version of Recordfr
oaire.citationTitleJournal of speech, language, and hearing researchfr
oaire.citationVolume66fr
oaire.citationIssue1fr
oaire.citationStartPage221fr
oaire.citationEndPage238fr


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.