Show item record

dc.contributor.authorSultana, Bushra
dc.contributor.authorPanzini, Marie-Andrée
dc.contributor.authorVeilleux Carpentier, Ariane
dc.contributor.authorComtois, Jacynthe
dc.contributor.authorRioux, Bastien
dc.contributor.authorGore, Geneviève
dc.contributor.authorBauer, Prisca R.
dc.contributor.authorKwon, Churl-Su
dc.contributor.authorJetté, Nathalie
dc.contributor.authorJosephson, Colin B.
dc.contributor.authorKeezer, Mark
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-25T12:07:32Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2022-10-25T12:07:32Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-15
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/26896
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkinsfr
dc.titleIncidence and prevalence of drug-resistant epilepsy : a systematic review and meta-analysisfr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté de médecine. Département de neurosciencesfr
dc.identifier.doi10.1212/WNL.0000000000011839
dcterms.abstractObjective To evaluate the incidence and prevalence of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) as well as its predictors and correlates, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Methods Our protocol was registered with PROSPERO, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology reporting standards were followed. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. We used a double arcsine transformation and random-effects models to perform our meta-analyses. We performed random-effects meta-regressions using study-level data. Results Our search strategy identified 10,794 abstracts. Of these, 103 articles met our eligibility criteria. There was high interstudy heterogeneity and risk of bias. The cumulative incidence of DRE was 25.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.8–34.3) in child studies but 14.6% (95% CI: 8.8–21.6) in adult/mixed age studies. The prevalence of DRE was 13.7% (95% CI: 9.2–19.0) in population/community-based populations but 36.3% (95% CI: 30.4–42.4) in clinic-based cohorts. Meta-regression confirmed that the prevalence of DRE was higher in clinic-based populations and in focal epilepsy. Multiple predictors and correlates of DRE were identified. The most reported of these were having a neurologic deficit, an abnormal EEG, and symptomatic epilepsy. The most reported genetic predictors of DRE were polymorphisms of the ABCB1 gene. Conclusions Our observations provide a basis for estimating the incidence and prevalence of DRE, which vary between populations. We identified numerous putative DRE predictors and correlates. These findings are important to plan epilepsy services, including epilepsy surgery, a crucial treatment option for people with disabling seizures and DRE.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:0028-3878fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1526-632Xfr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposantDOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011839fr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscriptfr
oaire.citationTitleNeurologyfr
oaire.citationVolume96fr
oaire.citationIssue17fr


Files in this item

Thumbnail
File
File
File
File
File

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.