Show item record

dc.contributor.authorAuger, Claudine
dc.contributor.authorMortenson, W. Ben
dc.contributor.authorJutai, Jeffrey W.
dc.contributor.authorSeguin-Tremblay, Noemie
dc.contributor.authorChenel, Vanessa
dc.contributor.authorGuay, Manon
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-10T14:56:08Z
dc.date.availableMONTHS_WITHHELD:12fr
dc.date.available2021-09-10T14:56:08Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-13
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/25704
dc.rightsDroits d'utilisation:Ce document est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’utilisation commerciale 4.0 International. / This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.fr
dc.subjectActivities of daily livingfr
dc.subjectAgingfr
dc.subjectAssistive technologyfr
dc.subjectDecision support systemfr
dc.subjectInformation and communication technologiesfr
dc.subjectValidation studiesfr
dc.titleOlder adults’ use of an on-line decision support system : usability and stability of assistive technology recommendationsfr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté de médecine. École de réadaptationfr
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre de recherche interdisciplinaire en réadaptation du Montréal métropolitain
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10400435.2020.1815251
dcterms.abstractOnline decision support systems (DSS) may help older adults self-select assistive technology (AT) by offering recommendations. User interactions with DSSs may change the recommendations they receive. Objective: We evaluated recommendations stability and usability of an online DSS. Methods: Middle-aged and older adults (n = 43) were observed while using the DSS. The stability of DSS recommendations (ATs and advice) was compared between two time points, using a three-point scale: no, partial, or full agreement. Usability was coded, referencing ISO standards. Results: Half (51%) of participants received AT recommendations from the DSS in both sessions, with full (14%) or partial (12%) agreement. All but one participant received advice, and almost all of them had full (40%) or partial (56%) agreement between sessions. Many of the usability issues appear to be the result of the users inaccurately measuring their environment, challenges in understanding the questions being asked, and improperly making selections from the system. Discussion: Strict AT matching rules versus generic advice, and usability issues, likely reduced the matching rate and stability of AT recommendations. Conclusion: It appears that some users may require assistance with the system, and we suggest changes to the DSS format and content to improve stability and usability.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1040-0435fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1949-3614fr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposantAuger, C., W. B. Mortenson, J. W. Jutai, N. Seguin-Tremblay, V. Chenel and M. Guay (2020). "Older adults’ use of an online decision support system: Usability and stability of assistive technology recommendations." Assistive Technology: 1-10. doi 10.1080/10400435.2020.1815251fr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscriptfr
oaire.citationTitleAssistive technologyfr


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

Droits d'utilisation:Ce document est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’utilisation commerciale 4.0 International. / This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Usage rights : Droits d'utilisation:Ce document est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’utilisation commerciale 4.0 International. / This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial 4.0 International License.