Afficher la notice

Inclusion of relatives in stroke rehabilitation : Perception of quality of services they received in the context of early supported discharged (ESD), in- and out-patient services

dc.contributor.authorRochette, Annie
dc.contributor.authorDugas, Ariane
dc.contributor.authorMorissette-Gravel, Anne-Sophie
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-06T14:08:16Z
dc.date.availableMONTHS_WITHHELD:12fr
dc.date.available2021-04-06T14:08:16Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-11
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/24953
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisfr
dc.subjectStrokefr
dc.subjectRehabilitationfr
dc.subjectRelativesfr
dc.subjectQuality of servicesfr
dc.subjectEarly supported dischargedfr
dc.subjectInformation and trainingfr
dc.titleInclusion of relatives in stroke rehabilitation : Perception of quality of services they received in the context of early supported discharged (ESD), in- and out-patient servicesfr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté de médecine. École de réadaptationfr
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10749357.2020.1790731
dcterms.abstractBackground Relatives of stroke patients should be an integral part of the continuum of rehabilitation services. Objective The objective was to describe their perception of the quality of the services they received in the context of early supported discharged (ESD), in- and out-patient rehabilitation services. Methods Descriptive study using the Quality of Services Questionnaire for Relatives post-stroke (QSQR) completed online by relatives after the patient’s discharge. It consists of 22 statements with respect to three subscales: 1) the training/instructions, 2) the information provision and 3) the organizational process of the service offer. Space is allowed for free comments and two open-ended questions. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and we used a content analysis for qualitative data. Results One-third (30/90; 33.3%) of the sample are composed of relatives aged 55 and under, with a majority (81%) of women and 51.3% of spouses. The training/instructions and information provision were perceived positively with a mean % agreement at 85.0 ± 29.6 and 84.8 ± 22.4, respectively. The mean % agreement was 91.4 ± 17.8 for the organizational process subscale. A significantly higher score (p = 0,03; Kruskal Wallis test) was found for out-patient services (n = 20) as compared to ESD (n = 29) or in-patient rehabilitation (n = 41). Qualitatively, a lack of involvement of relatives was mentioned as well as a lack of personalized information about stroke and its consequences and provision of resources available. However, communication between professionals, their availability, and their professionalism were appreciated. Conclusion Despite quantitative high scores, qualitative data allowed the identification of concrete avenues for improvement to truly and systematically include relatives in stroke rehabilitation.fr
dcterms.alternativeQuality of stroke rehabilitation services to relativesfr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1074-9357fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1945-5119fr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposantRochette A, *Dugas A & *Morissette-Gravel AS. (2021). Inclusion of relatives in stroke rehabilitation: Perception of quality of services they received in the context of early supported discharged (ESD), in and out-patient services. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 28 (2), 142-152.https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2020.1790731fr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion publiée / Version of Recordfr
oaire.citationTitleTopics in stroke rehabilitationfr
oaire.citationVolume28fr
oaire.citationIssue2fr
oaire.citationStartPage142fr
oaire.citationEndPage152fr


Fichier·s constituant ce document

Vignette
Microsoft Word

Ce document figure dans la ou les collections suivantes

Afficher la notice

Ce document diffusé sur Papyrus est la propriété exclusive des titulaires des droits d'auteur et est protégé par la Loi sur le droit d'auteur (L.R.C. (1985), ch. C-42). Il peut être utilisé dans le cadre d'une utilisation équitable et non commerciale, à des fins d'étude privée ou de recherche, de critique ou de compte-rendu comme le prévoit la Loi. Pour toute autre utilisation, une autorisation écrite des titulaires des droits d'auteur sera nécessaire.