The role of handbooks in knowledge creation and diffusion : a case of science and technology studies
dc.contributor.author | Milojević, Staša | |
dc.contributor.author | Sugimoto, Cassidy R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Larivière, Vincent | |
dc.contributor.author | Thelwall, Mike | |
dc.contributor.author | Ding, Ying | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-09T16:29:16Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | fr |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-09T16:29:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-07-09 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/23246 | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | fr |
dc.title | The role of handbooks in knowledge creation and diffusion : a case of science and technology studies | fr |
dc.type | Article | fr |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Université de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l'information | fr |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.joi.2014.06.003 | |
dcterms.abstract | Genre is considered to be an important element in scholarly communication and in the practice of scientific disciplines. However, scientometric studies have typically focused on a single genre, the journal article. The goal of this study is to understand the role that handbooks play in knowledge creation and diffusion and their relationship with the genre of journal articles, particularly in highly interdisciplinary and emergent social science and humanities disciplines. To shed light on these questions we focused on handbooks and journal articles published over the last four decades belonging to the research area of Science and Technology Studies (STS), broadly defined. To get a detailed picture we used the full-text of five handbooks (500,000 words) and a well-defined set of 11,700 STS articles. We confirmed the methodological split of STS into qualitative and quantitative (scientometric) approaches. Even when the two traditions explore similar topics (e.g., science and gender) they approach them from different starting points. The change in cognitive foci in both handbooks and articles partially reflects the changing trends in STS research, often driven by technology. Using text similarity measures we found that, in the case of STS, handbooks play no special role in either focusing the research efforts or marking their decline. In general, they do not represent the summaries of research directions that have emerged since the previous edition of the handbook. | fr |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:1751-1577 | fr |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:1875-5879 | fr |
dcterms.language | eng | fr |
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposant | The role of handbooks in knowledge creation and diffusion: A case of science and technology studies Milojevic, S., Sugimoto, C.R., Larivière, V., Thelwall, M., Ding, Y. (2014). The role of handbooks in knowledge creation and diffusion: A case of science and technology studies. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3): 693–709. | fr |
UdeM.VersionRioxx | Version acceptée / Accepted Manuscript | fr |
oaire.citationTitle | Journal of informetrics | |
oaire.citationVolume | 8 | |
oaire.citationIssue | 3 | |
oaire.citationStartPage | 693 | |
oaire.citationEndPage | 709 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.