Afficher la notice

dc.contributor.authorMilojević, Staša
dc.contributor.authorSugimoto, Cassidy R.
dc.contributor.authorLarivière, Vincent
dc.contributor.authorThelwall, Mike
dc.contributor.authorDing, Ying
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-09T16:29:16Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2020-04-09T16:29:16Z
dc.date.issued2014-07-09
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/23246
dc.publisherElsevierfr
dc.titleThe role of handbooks in knowledge creation and diffusion : a case of science and technology studiesfr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l'informationfr
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joi.2014.06.003
dcterms.abstractGenre is considered to be an important element in scholarly communication and in the practice of scientific disciplines. However, scientometric studies have typically focused on a single genre, the journal article. The goal of this study is to understand the role that handbooks play in knowledge creation and diffusion and their relationship with the genre of journal articles, particularly in highly interdisciplinary and emergent social science and humanities disciplines. To shed light on these questions we focused on handbooks and journal articles published over the last four decades belonging to the research area of Science and Technology Studies (STS), broadly defined. To get a detailed picture we used the full-text of five handbooks (500,000 words) and a well-defined set of 11,700 STS articles. We confirmed the methodological split of STS into qualitative and quantitative (scientometric) approaches. Even when the two traditions explore similar topics (e.g., science and gender) they approach them from different starting points. The change in cognitive foci in both handbooks and articles partially reflects the changing trends in STS research, often driven by technology. Using text similarity measures we found that, in the case of STS, handbooks play no special role in either focusing the research efforts or marking their decline. In general, they do not represent the summaries of research directions that have emerged since the previous edition of the handbook.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1751-1577fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1875-5879fr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposantThe role of handbooks in knowledge creation and diffusion: A case of science and technology studies Milojevic, S., Sugimoto, C.R., Larivière, V., Thelwall, M., Ding, Y. (2014). The role of handbooks in knowledge creation and diffusion: A case of science and technology studies. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3): 693–709.fr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscriptfr
oaire.citationTitleJournal of informetrics
oaire.citationVolume8
oaire.citationIssue3
oaire.citationStartPage693
oaire.citationEndPage709


Fichier·s constituant ce document

Vignette

Ce document figure dans la ou les collections suivantes

Afficher la notice

Ce document diffusé sur Papyrus est la propriété exclusive des titulaires des droits d'auteur et est protégé par la Loi sur le droit d'auteur (L.R.C. (1985), ch. C-42). Il peut être utilisé dans le cadre d'une utilisation équitable et non commerciale, à des fins d'étude privée ou de recherche, de critique ou de compte-rendu comme le prévoit la Loi. Pour toute autre utilisation, une autorisation écrite des titulaires des droits d'auteur sera nécessaire.