Abstract(s)
‘Preparing for the next epidemic’ has been a recurrent theme in global
health in recent years. Starting with SARS, by way of the Avian influenza, and
intensifying after the 2013–2016 Ebola outbreak, the urgency of preparing
for the next health disaster has been recommended by numerous global
health stakeholders. Recommendations and global partnerships are aligned
with the many action proposals that have been formulated by international
political actors, including the WHO, that have made ‘preparedness for
the next epidemic’ a new paradigm, alongside prevention. The intent
of this commentary is to argue the need to discuss some aspects of the
preparedness paradigm from both health and democratic perspectives. We
believe preparedness reveals a new and problematic biopolitical orientation
in global health. Our argument is that preparedness enacts a model that:
(i) reconfigures knowledge about epidemics by disconnecting them from
the social and historical contexts in which they arise and (ii) imposes new
modalities of intervention that raise issues for democratic autonomy. After
first tracing back the genealogy of the preparedness paradigm, this paper
then discusses some of the issues at stake for both health and democracy.