Afficher la notice

dc.contributor.authorTannenbaum, Cara
dc.contributor.authorBrouillette, Judith
dc.contributor.authorMichaud, Julie
dc.contributor.authorKorner-Bitensky, Nicol
dc.contributor.authorDumoulin, Chantale
dc.contributor.authorCorcos, Jacques
dc.contributor.authorTu, Le Mai
dc.contributor.authorLemieux, Marie-Claude
dc.contributor.authorOuellet, Stéphane
dc.contributor.authorValiquette, Luc
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-26T14:07:54Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2016-08-26T14:07:54Z
dc.date.issued2009-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/14123
dc.titleResponsiveness and clinical utility of the geriatric self-efficacy index for urinary incontinencefr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté de médecine. École de réadaptationfr
UdeM.statutProfesseur(e) / Professorfr
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02146.x
dcterms.abstractOBJECTIVES: To report on the responsiveness testing and clinical utility of the 12-item Geriatric Self-Efficacy Index for Urinary Incontinence (GSE-UI). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Six urinary incontinence (UI) outpatient clinics in Quebec, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling incontinent adults aged 65 and older. MEASUREMENTS: The abridged 12-item GSE-UI, measuring older adults' level of confidence for preventing urine loss, was administered to all new consecutive incontinent patients 1 week before their initial clinic visit, at baseline, and 3 months posttreatment. At follow-up, a positive rating of improvement in UI was ascertained from patients and their physicians using the Patient's and Clinician's Global Impression of Improvement scales, respectively. Responsiveness of the GSE-UI was calculated using Guyatt's change index. Its clinical utility was determined using receiver operating curves. RESULTS: Eighty-nine of 228 eligible patients (39.0%) participated (mean age 72.6+5.8, range 65–90). At 3-month follow-up, 22.5% of patients were very much better, and 41.6% were a little or much better. Guyatt's change index was 2.6 for patients who changed by a clinically meaningful amount and 1.5 for patients having experienced any level of improvement. An improvement of 14 points on the 12-item GSE-UI had a sensitivity of 75.1% and a specificity of 78.2% for detecting clinically meaningful changes in UI status. Mean GSE-UI scores varied according to improvement status (P<.001) and correlated with changes in quality-of-life scores (r=0.7, P<.001) and reductions in UI episodes (r=0.4, P=.004). CONCLUSION: The GSE-UI is responsive and clinically useful.fr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscript
oaire.citationTitleJournal of the American geriatrics society
oaire.citationVolume54
oaire.citationIssue3
oaire.citationStartPage470
oaire.citationEndPage475


Fichier·s constituant ce document

Vignette

Ce document figure dans la ou les collections suivantes

Afficher la notice

Ce document diffusé sur Papyrus est la propriété exclusive des titulaires des droits d'auteur et est protégé par la Loi sur le droit d'auteur (L.R.C. (1985), ch. C-42). Il peut être utilisé dans le cadre d'une utilisation équitable et non commerciale, à des fins d'étude privée ou de recherche, de critique ou de compte-rendu comme le prévoit la Loi. Pour toute autre utilisation, une autorisation écrite des titulaires des droits d'auteur sera nécessaire.