☃ ❄ ⛄ ☃ ❄ ⛄ CONGÉ DES FÊTES 2018 : Veuillez noter qu'il n'y aura pas de suivi des dépôts des thèses, mémoires et travaux étudiants après le 20 décembre 2018. Retour aux délais réguliers dès le 3 janvier 2019.
Is Breast Asymmetry Present in Girls with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?
|dc.identifier.citation||Ramsay J, Joncas J, Gilbert G, Trop I, Cheriet F, Labelle H, et al. Is Breast Asymmetry Present in Girls with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis? Spine Deform. 2014;2(5):374-9.||fr|
|dc.description.sponsorship||CIHR / IRSC||fr|
|dc.subject||Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis|
|dc.subject||Magnetic resonance imaging|
|dc.title||Is Breast Asymmetry Present in Girls with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?||fr|
|dc.contributor.affiliation||Université de Montréal. Faculté de médecine. Département de chirurgie||fr|
|dcterms.abstract||Study Design Cross-sectional descriptive study. Objectives To characterize breast asymmetry (BA), as defined by breast volume difference, in girls with significant adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Summary and Background BA is a frequent concern among girls with AIS. It is commonly believed that this results from chest wall deformity. Although many women exhibit physiological BA, the prevalence is not known in adolescents and it remains unclear if it is more frequent in AIS. Breasts vary in shape and size and many ways of measuring them have been explored. MRI shows the highest precision at defining breast tissue. Methods Thirty patients were enrolled on the basis of their thoracic curvature, skeletal and breast maturity, without regard to their perception on their BA. MRI acquisitions were performed in prone with a 1.5-Tesla system using a 16-channel breast coil. Segmentation was achieved using the ITK-SNAP 2.4.0 software and subsequently manually refined. Results The mean left breast volume (528.32 ± 205.96 cc) was greater compared with the mean right breast volume (495.18 ± 170.16 cc) with a significant difference between them. The mean BA was found to be 8.32% ± 6.43% (p < .0001). A weak positive correlation was observed between BA and thoracic Cobb angle (0.177, p = .349) as well as thoracic gibbosity angle (0.289, p = .122). The left breast was consistently larger in 65.5% of the patients. Twenty patients (66.7%) displayed BA ≥5%. Conclusions We have described BA in patients with significant AIS using MRI. This method is feasible, objective, and very precise. The majority of patients had a larger left breast, which could compound the apparent BA secondary to trunk rotation. In many cases, BA is present independently of thoracic deformity. This knowledge will assist in counseling AIS patients in regards to their concerns with BA.||fr|
|dcterms.bibliographicCitation||Spine Deformity ; vol. 2, no 5|
|UdeM.VersionRioxx||Version acceptée / Accepted Manuscript|