Show item record

dc.contributor.authorDe Clifford-Faugère, Gwenaëlle
dc.contributor.authorLavallée, Andréane
dc.contributor.authorKhadra, Christelle
dc.contributor.authorBallard, Ariane
dc.contributor.authorColson, Sébastien
dc.contributor.authorAita, Marilyn
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-10T17:52:32Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2024-06-10T17:52:32Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-24
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/33341
dc.publisherElsevierfr
dc.rightsATTRIBUTION - PAS D’UTILISATION COMMERCIALE - PAS DE MODIFICATION 4.0 INTERNATIONAL CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Deed
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.fr
dc.subjectPainfr
dc.subjectOdorfr
dc.subjectNon-pharmacological interventionfr
dc.subjectNeonatologyfr
dc.subjectSystematic reviewfr
dc.titleSystematic review and meta-analysis of olfactive stimulation interventions to manage procedural pain in preterm and full-term neonatesfr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté des sciences infirmièresfr
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103697
dcterms.abstractBackground Preterm and full-term neonates undergo many painful procedures during their hospitalization in the neonatal intensive care unit. Unrelieved and repeated pain can have important repercussions on their motor and intellectual development. Still, pain management interventions are limited for neonates. Objective This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of olfactive stimulation interventions on the pain response of preterm and full-term infants during painful procedures. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources An electronic search was conducted from inception to August 2019 in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Sciences, CENTRAL, Scopus and ProQuest. Review methods Study selection, data extraction, assessment of risk of bias and quality of evidence were performed by two independent reviewers. Results 3311 studies were screened. Of the 14 studies included studies (n = 1028 infants), results from 10 were combined in meta-analysis. The latter demonstrated that olfactive stimulation interventions using a familiar odor were effective compared to standard care on pain reactivity (SMD -0.69; 95% CI -0.93 to -0.44; I2 = 20%, p < 0.00001), pain regulation (SMD -0.40; 95% CI -0.66 to -0.14; I2 = 13%, p = 0.002), crying duration during (SMD -0.42; 95% CI -0.73 to -0.10; I2 = 47%, p = 0.009) and after the procedure (SMD -0.37; 95% CI -0.68 to -0.07; I2 = 0%, p = 0.01), heart rate after the procedure (MD -3.87; 95% CI -7.36 to -0.38; I2 = 99%, p = 0.03), oxygen saturation during (MD -0.47; 95% CI -0.86 to -0.08; I2 = 91%, p = 0.02) and after the procedure (MD -0.56; 95% CI -0.99 to -0.13; I2 = 99%, p = 0.01). No adverse event was reported. Conclusion These findings are based on low to very low quality of evidence limiting our confidence in effect estimates. More rigorous trials with a larger sample size are needed to enhance the comprehension of the mechanisms underlying olfactive stimulation interventions and the interventions’ efficacy.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:0020-7489fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1873-491Xfr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposantDe Clifford-Faugère G, Lavallée A, Khadra C, Ballard A, Colson S et Aita M (2020). Systematic review and meta-analysis of olfactive stimulation interventions for managing procedural pain in preterm and full-term neonates. IJNS. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103697fr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscriptfr
oaire.citationTitleInternational journal of nursing studiesfr
oaire.citationVolume110fr


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

ATTRIBUTION - PAS D’UTILISATION COMMERCIALE - PAS DE MODIFICATION 4.0 INTERNATIONAL
    CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Deed
Usage rights : ATTRIBUTION - PAS D’UTILISATION COMMERCIALE - PAS DE MODIFICATION 4.0 INTERNATIONAL CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Deed