dc.contributor.author | Charlin, Bernard | |
dc.contributor.author | Deschênes, Marie-France | |
dc.contributor.author | Fernandez, Nicolas | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-17T14:06:55Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | fr |
dc.date.available | 2024-01-17T14:06:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-03-29 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/32392 | |
dc.publisher | Taylor and Francis | fr |
dc.rights | CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.fr | |
dc.subject | Learning by concordance | fr |
dc.subject | Assessing by concordance | fr |
dc.subject | Reasoning | fr |
dc.subject | Professional education | fr |
dc.subject | Script theory | fr |
dc.subject | Tool design | fr |
dc.subject | Education in health sciences | fr |
dc.title | Learning by concordance (LbC) to develop professional reasoning skills : AMEE guide no. 141 | fr |
dc.type | Article | fr |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Université de Montréal. Faculté des sciences infirmières | fr |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1900554 | |
dcterms.abstract | Developing effective clinical reasoning is central to health professions education.
Learning by concordance (LbC) is an on-line educational strategy that makes learners
practice reasoning competency in case-based clinical situations. The questions asked are
similar to those professionals ask themselves in their practice and participant answers are
compared to those of a reference panel. When participants answer the questions, they
receive an automated feedback that is two-fold as they see (1) how the panelists respond
and (2) justifications each panelist gives for their answer. This provides rich contextual
knowledge about the situation, supplemented by a synthesis summarizing crucial points.
As many educators in the health sciences are engaging in introducing innovative
approaches, many consider building LbC learning modules. Elaborating, designing and
implementing a LbC tool remain a challenge. This AMEE Guide describes the steps and
elements to be considered when designing a LbC tool, drawing on examples from distinct
health professions: medicine, nursing, physiotherapy, and dentistry.
Specifically, the following elements will be discussed: 1) LbC theoretical
underpinnings; 2) principles of LbC questioning; 3) goals of the concordance-based
activity; 4) nature of reasoning tasks; 5) content / levels of complexity; 6) reference panel;
7) feedback / synthesis messages; 8) on-line learning platforms. | fr |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:0142-159X | fr |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:1466-187X | fr |
dcterms.language | eng | fr |
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposant | Charlin, B., Deschênes, M.-F. et Fernandez, N. (2021). Designing learning by concordance (LbC) tools to develop professional reasoning skills: What are the stages and issues to consider? Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE)-Guide no 141, Medical Teacher. 43(6), 614-621. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1900554 | fr |
UdeM.VersionRioxx | Version acceptée / Accepted Manuscript | fr |
oaire.citationTitle | Medical teacher | fr |
oaire.citationVolume | 46 | fr |
oaire.citationIssue | 3 | fr |
oaire.citationStartPage | 614 | fr |
oaire.citationEndPage | 621 | fr |