Methodological reporting in feasibility studies : a descriptive review of the nursing intervention research literature
dc.contributor.author | Mailhot, Tanya | |
dc.contributor.author | Goulet, Marie-Hélène | |
dc.contributor.author | Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André | |
dc.contributor.author | Fontaine, Guillaume | |
dc.contributor.author | Lequin, Pierre | |
dc.contributor.author | Lavoie, Patrick | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-27T18:49:45Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | fr |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-27T18:49:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/27728 | |
dc.publisher | SAGE | fr |
dc.subject | Feasibility study | fr |
dc.subject | Nursing interventions | fr |
dc.subject | Pilot study | fr |
dc.subject | Research design | fr |
dc.subject | Research methodology | fr |
dc.title | Methodological reporting in feasibility studies : a descriptive review of the nursing intervention research literature | fr |
dc.type | Article | fr |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Université de Montréal. Faculté des sciences infirmières | fr |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/1744987119883404 | |
dcterms.abstract | Background In reaction to weaknesses in feasibility studies reporting, the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement published an extension for feasibility studies in 2016. Aim The aim of this study was to systematically review and appraise the reporting of feasibility studies in the nursing intervention research literature based on the CONSORT statement extension for feasibility studies. Method Papers published prior to January 2018 that described feasibility studies of nursing interventions were retrieved. Components of feasibility studies were coded, and code frequencies were analysed. Results The review included 186 papers. Although most papers (n = 142, 76.3%) included the label ‘pilot’ or ‘feasibility’ in their title, reporting for other components generally did not adhere to one or several CONSORT recommendations. Most papers reported objectives (n = 116, 62.4%), designs (n = 95, 51%), or rationales for sample size (n = 165, 88.7%) that were incongruent with the purpose of feasibility studies. Discussion This review results in two main implications for nursing research. First, we noted that the reporting of feasibility studies is weak. While all papers described feasibility studies, almost half focused exclusively on testing the effectiveness of an intervention. Second, we identified rationales for sample size along with key references that could offer guidance in reporting feasibility studies while being coherent with the CONSORT recommendations. | fr |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:1744-9871 | fr |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:1744-988X | fr |
dcterms.language | eng | fr |
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposant | Mailhot, T., Goulet, M-H., Maheu-Cadotte, M-A., Fontaine, G., Lequin, P. et Lavoie, P. (2020). Methodological reporting in feasibility studies: A descriptive review of the nursing intervention research literature. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(5), 460-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987119883404 | fr |
UdeM.VersionRioxx | Version acceptée / Accepted Manuscript | fr |
oaire.citationTitle | Journal of research in nursing | fr |
oaire.citationVolume | 25 | fr |
oaire.citationIssue | 5 | fr |
oaire.citationStartPage | 460 | fr |
oaire.citationEndPage | 472 | fr |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.