Show item record

dc.contributor.authorMailhot, Tanya
dc.contributor.authorLavoie, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorMaheu-Cadotte, Marc-André
dc.contributor.authorFontaine, Guillaume
dc.contributor.authorCournoyer, Alexis
dc.contributor.authorCôté, José
dc.contributor.authorDupuis, France
dc.contributor.authorKarsenti, Thierry
dc.contributor.authorCossette, Sylvie
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-22T13:12:57Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2023-03-22T13:12:57Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/27715
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams and Wilkinsfr
dc.subjectE-healthfr
dc.subjectE-learningfr
dc.subjectElectroencephalographyfr
dc.subjectEngagementfr
dc.subjectPilot studyfr
dc.titleUsing a wireless electroencephalography device to evaluate e-health and e-learning interventionsfr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté des sciences infirmièresfr
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/NNR.0000000000000260
dcterms.abstractBackground: Measuring engagement and other reactions of patients and health professionals to e-health and e-learning interventions remains a challenge for researchers. Objective: The aim of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of using a wireless electroencephalography (EEG) device to measure affective (anxiety, enjoyment, relaxation) and cognitive (attention, engagement, interest) reactions of patients and healthcare professionals during e-health or e-learning interventions. Methods: Using a wireless EEG device, we measured patient (n = 6) and health professional (n = 7) reactions during a 10-minute session of an e-health or e-learning intervention. The following feasibility and acceptability indicators were assessed and compared for patients and healthcare professionals: number of eligible participants who consented to participate, reasons for refusal, time to install and calibrate the wireless EEG device, number of participants who completed the full 10-minute sessions, participant comfort when wearing the device, signal quality, and number of observations obtained for each reaction. The wireless EEG readings were compared to participant self-rating of their reactions. Results: We obtained at least 75% of possible observations for attention, engagement, enjoyment, and interest. EEG scores were similar to self-reported scores, but they varied throughout the sessions, which gave information on participants’ real-time reactions to the e-health/e-learning interventions. Results on the other indicators support the feasibility and acceptability of the wireless EEG device for both patients and professionals. Discussion: Using the wireless EEG device was feasible and acceptable. Future studies must examine its use in other contexts of care and explore which components of the interventions affected participant reactions by combining wireless EEG and eye tracking.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:0029-6562fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1538-9847fr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposantMailhot, T., Lavoie, P., Maheu-Cadotte, M-A., Fontaine, G., Cournoyer, A., Côté, J., Dupuis, F., Karsenti, T. et Cossette, S. (2018). Using a wireless EEG device to evaluate E-health and E-learning interventions. Nursing Research, 67, 43-48. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000260fr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscriptfr
oaire.citationTitleNursing researchfr
oaire.citationVolume67fr
oaire.citationIssue1fr
oaire.citationStartPage43fr
oaire.citationEndPage48fr


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.