Show item record

dc.contributor.authorJohri, Mira
dc.contributor.authorPérez Osorio, Myriam Cielo
dc.contributor.authorArsenault, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Jitendar K.
dc.contributor.authorPai, Nitika Pant
dc.contributor.authorPahwa, Smriti
dc.contributor.authorSylvestre, Marie-Pierre
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-17T15:02:19Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2022-10-17T15:02:19Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/26787
dc.publisherWorld Health Organizationfr
dc.titleStrategies to increase the demand for childhood vaccination in lowand middle-income countries : a systematic review and meta-analysisfr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. École de santé publique. Département de médecine sociale et préventivefr
dc.identifier.doi10.2471/BLT.14.146951
dcterms.abstractObjective To investigate which strategies to increase demand for vaccination are effective in increasing child vaccine coverage in low- and middle-income countries. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, POPLINE, ECONLIT, CINAHL, LILACS, BDSP, Web of Science and Scopus databases for relevant studies, published in English, French, German, Hindi, Portuguese and Spanish up to 25 March 2014. We included studies of interventions intended to increase demand for routine childhood vaccination. Studies were eligible if conducted in low- and middle-income countries and employing a randomized controlled trial, non-randomized controlled trial, controlled before-and-after or interrupted time series design. We estimated risk of bias using Cochrane collaboration guidelines and performed random-effects meta-analysis. Findings We identified 11 studies comprising four randomized controlled trials, six cluster randomized controlled trials and one controlled before-and-after study published in English between 1996 and 2013. Participants were generally parents of young children exposed to an eligible intervention. Six studies demonstrated low risk of bias and five studies had moderate to high risk of bias. We conducted a pooled analysis considering all 11 studies, with data from 11 512 participants. Demand-side interventions were associated with significantly higher receipt of vaccines, relative risk (RR): 1.30, (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.17–1.44). Subgroup analyses also demonstrated significant effects of seven education and knowledge translation studies, RR: 1.40 (95% CI: 1.20–1.63) and of four studies which used incentives, RR: 1.28 (95% CI: 1.12–1.45). Conclusion Demand-side interventions lead to significant gains in child vaccination coverage in low- and middle-income countries. Educational approaches and use of incentives were both effective strategies.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:0042-9686fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1564-0604fr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposantJohri M, Perez MC, Arsenault C, Sharma JK, Pai NP, Pahwa S, and Sylvestre MP. Strategies to Increase the Demand for Childhood Vaccination in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2015. 93(5): p. 339-346C.fr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion publiée / Version of Recordfr
oaire.citationTitleBulletin of the World Health Organizationfr
oaire.citationVolume93fr
oaire.citationStartPage339fr
oaire.citationEndPage346fr


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.