Show item record

dc.contributor.authorEhlers, Lars
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-24T14:19:05Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2021-11-24T14:19:05Z
dc.date.issued2021-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/25819
dc.publisherCentre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitativefr
dc.subjectSingle-peaked preferencesfr
dc.subjectMultiple public goodsfr
dc.subjectLexicographicfr
dc.subjectReplacement-dominationfr
dc.titleThree public goods and lexicographic preferences : replacement principlefr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département de sciences économiquesfr
dcterms.abstractWe study the problem of locating multiple public goods for a group of agents with single-peaked preferences over an interval. An alternative specifies for each public good a location. In Miyagawa (1998) each agent consumes only his most preferred public good without rivalry. We extend preferences lexicographically and characterize the class of rules satisfying Pareto-optimality and replacementdomination. We show that for three public goods, this results in a very similar characterization to Miyagawa (2001a): only the two rules which either always chooses the left-most Pareto-optimal alternative or always chooses the rightmost Pareto-optimal alternative satisfy these properties. This is in contrast to Ehlers (2002) who showed that for two goods the corresponding characterization is substantially different to Miyagawa (2001a).fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:0821-4441fr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposantThree public goods and lexicographic preferences: replacement principle Lars Ehlersfr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscriptfr
oaire.citationTitleCahierfr


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.