Show item record

dc.contributor.authorSéguin, Monique
dc.contributor.authorChawky, Nadia
dc.contributor.authorLesage, Alain
dc.contributor.authorBoyer, Richard
dc.contributor.authorGuay, Stéphane
dc.contributor.authorBleau, Pierre
dc.contributor.authorMiquelon, Paule
dc.contributor.authorSzkrumelak, Nadia
dc.contributor.authorWarren, Steiner
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Denise
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-18T14:33:15Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2018-05-18T14:33:15Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/20003
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Associationfr
dc.subjectPosttraumatic interventionfr
dc.subjectSchool shootingfr
dc.subjectTraumafr
dc.subjectPTSDfr
dc.subjectMental healthfr
dc.titleEvaluation of the Dawson College shooting psychological intervention: moving toward a multimodal extensive planfr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. École de criminologiefr
UdeM.statutProfesseur(e) / Professorfr
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/a0027745
dcterms.abstractIn 2006, following the shooting at Dawson College, the authorities implemented an intervention plan. This provided an opportunity to analyze the responses to services offered, and afforded a learning opportunity, which led to the proposal of an extensive multimodal short- and long-term psychological plan for future needs. Both quantitative and qualitative data were gathered 18 months after the event, involving the participation of 948 students and staff. Mental health problems and the perception of services offered after the shooting were investigated, using standardized measures. Second, focus groups and individual interviews were conducted among a subgroup of participants (support team members; teachers and employees; students and parents) and permitted to gather data on services received and services required. Individual report of events, the extent of psychological impact and services offered and received were analyzed in terms of the following dimensions: intervention philosophy, training, ongoing offer of services and finally, detection and outreach. A significant incidence of disorders and a high rate of exacerbation of preexisting mental disorders were observed within the 18 months following the shooting. Postimmediate and short-term intervention appeared adequate, but the long-term collective vision toward community support and availability of mental health services were lacking. Lessons learned from this evaluation and other school shootings suggest that preparedness and long-term community responses are often overlooked. A multimodal extensive plan is proposed based on a theoretical model from which interventions strategies could be drawn.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1942-9681
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscriptfr
oaire.citationTitlePsychological trauma : theory, research, practice, and policy
oaire.citationVolume5
oaire.citationIssue3
oaire.citationStartPage268
oaire.citationEndPage276


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.