Show item record

dc.contributor.authorRothmayr Allison, Christine
dc.contributor.authorSt-Martin, Denis
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-15T18:42:43Z
dc.date.available2017-05-15T18:42:43Z
dc.date.issued2011-02
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/18545
dc.subjectIncrémentalismefr
dc.subjectPolitiques publiquesfr
dc.subjectAdministration publiquefr
dc.titleHalf a Century of “Muddling”: Are We There Yet?fr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département de science politiquefr
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.12.001
dcterms.abstractHalf a century after the publication of Lindblom's seminal article “The Science of Muddling Through”, we revisit the heritage of incrementalism in this special issue, analyzing its legacy in public policy and public administration. The articles discuss the extent to which recent theoretical developments have transformed the original idea, reinforced it, or possibly rendered it obsolete. In this introductory article, we provide a short overview over the core elements of incrementalism and assess how the concept is used in scholarly publications and research today. We thereby focus on incrementalism as an analytical concept rather then a prescriptive theory. We argue that even after a half a century of “muddling”, we are not yet through with incrementalism. Some of the ideas that underpin the concept of incrementalism continue to drive research, often in combination with more recent theoretical approaches to the policy process. After half a century, incrementalism is still part of the policy scholar's tool kit.fr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscript
oaire.citationTitlePolicy and society
oaire.citationVolume30
oaire.citationIssue1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.