Diverging against all odds? Regulatory Paths in Embryonic Stem Cell Research across Western Europe
dc.contributor.author | Engeli, Isabelle | |
dc.contributor.author | Rothmayr Allison, Christine | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-15T18:41:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-05-15T18:41:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013-03-20 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/18544 | |
dc.subject | Convergence politique | fr |
dc.subject | Dépendance au sentier | fr |
dc.subject | Changement politique | fr |
dc.subject | Analyse comparée qualitative | fr |
dc.subject | Moralité politique | fr |
dc.title | Diverging against all odds? Regulatory Paths in Embryonic Stem Cell Research across Western Europe | |
dc.type | Article | fr |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Université de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département de science politique | fr |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/13501763.2013.761509 | |
dcterms.abstract | An interest-driven account of Embryonic Stem Cell Research would, given the considerable financial and scientific concerns, likely predict regulations to converge towards permissive policies. However, across Western Europe, national regulations of embryonic stem-cell research vary considerably, from general bans to permissive policies. There is a lack of systematic accounting for the non-convergence, and the sparse attempts at explanation are contradictory. Drawing on qualitative comparative analysis and configurational causality, we assess the interaction of a number of explanatory factors. Our empirical analysis reveals the importance of one factor in particular, path-dependence, insofar as prior policies on assisted reproduction exert a strong and systematic effect on the subsequent regulation of ESCR. | fr |
dcterms.language | eng | fr |
UdeM.VersionRioxx | Version acceptée / Accepted Manuscript | |
oaire.citationTitle | Journal of european publica policy | |
oaire.citationVolume | 20 | |
oaire.citationIssue | 3 | |
oaire.citationStartPage | 407 | |
oaire.citationEndPage | 424 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.