The Politics of Poverty in the European Union: How States Respond to the Open Method of Coordination on Social Inclusion
dc.contributor.author | Noël, Alain | |
dc.contributor.author | Larocque, Florence | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-09-01T19:45:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-09-01T19:45:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-07 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/12237 | |
dc.subject | Union européenne | fr |
dc.subject | Pauvreté | fr |
dc.title | The Politics of Poverty in the European Union: How States Respond to the Open Method of Coordination on Social Inclusion | fr |
dc.type | Article | fr |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Université de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département de science politique | fr |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1332/030557312X655882 | |
dcterms.abstract | This article assesses the responses of EU-15 member states to the poverty reduction objectives of the Open Method of Coordination (OMC) on social inclusion between 2001 and 2006. As a flexible mechanism of information sharing between governments, the OMC could not produce strong convergence. A thorough analysis of the OMC documents indeed points to the enduring power of national institutions and partisan politics, for the three dimensions of social inclusion identified by the EU (rights, labour market policies, and participation). There was however some learning and adaptation around emerging policy ideas like activation and the participation of people experiencing poverty. | fr |
dcterms.language | eng | fr |
UdeM.VersionRioxx | Version acceptée / Accepted Manuscript | |
oaire.citationTitle | Policy and politics | |
oaire.citationVolume | 42 | |
oaire.citationIssue | 3 | |
oaire.citationStartPage | 333 | |
oaire.citationEndPage | 350 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.