Show item record

dc.contributor.authorDukanic, Filip
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-06T17:26:53Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2020-02-06T17:26:53Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/23089
dc.publisherInstitute of comparative literature and transcultural studies of the chinese foreign literature societyfr
dc.subjectTechnoculturefr
dc.subjectExcommunicationfr
dc.subjectNonhuman theatrefr
dc.subjectThe water principlefr
dc.titleArtifacts of technoculture : excommunication in the nonhuman theatrefr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département des littératures de langue françaisefr
dcterms.abstractThe aim of this article is to form a conceptual framework for analyzing and understanding the latest intermedial practice within the field of new technologies. In order to achieve this, it suggests two converging theoretical strategies. Firstly, the introduction emphasizes on concept of “excommunication,” coined by Alexander R. Galloway in his 2013 book, in order to provide a better understanding of the scenic mediation that encompasses a great number of contemporary productions. More specifically, by both following and criticizing Galloway’s stance on three different media modalities, a fourth mediation vector will be isolated - The Water Principle - incorporated in the mythology of Neptune. Such a theoretical orientation is primarily guided by an ambition to associate intermedial theory with watery elements that appear in two different stage examples analyzed within this paper. Secondly, two different performances will be analyzed: Romeo Castellucci’s “M#10 Marseille” (2002) and “Fontaine Boréale” (2018). Prompted by intermedial issues, these two productions question the ontological claims of the human presence on stage by establishing digital stage simulation as a para-performative phenomenon. By analyzing these plays, I will demonstrate that in both examples, the Water Principle delivers a privileged media model through which aesthetic force is achieved. Finally, on a broader level, the paper suggests that the artistic trajectory of these productions calls for a new perspective on the nature of performance; a perspective emphasizing an aesthetics of disappearance and nonhuman structural impact.fr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposantJournal of Comparative Literature and Transcultural Studies, Shanghai jiao tong university http://sfl.sjtu.edu.cn/En/Data/View/3979fr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscriptfr
oaire.citationTitleComparative literature and transcultural studies


Files in this item

Microsoft Word

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.