Show item record

dc.contributor.authorHarrington, Matthew
dc.date.accessioned2008-02-20T16:38:35Z
dc.date.available2008-02-20T16:38:35Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/2166
dc.format.extent1752527 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherRoger Williams University Law Reviewen
dc.subjectRetroactive laws
dc.subjectCalder v. Bull
dc.subjectex post facto clause
dc.titleForeword, The Dual Dichotomy of Retroactive Lawmakingen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté de droitfr
dcterms.description[À l'origine dans / Was originally part of : Fac. Droit - Coll. facultaire - Généralités]fr
dcterms.languageengen
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscript
oaire.citationTitleRoger Williams University law review
oaire.citationStartPage19
oaire.citationEndPage33


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.