Threshold Luce rules
| dc.contributor.author | Horan, Sean | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-12-05T19:06:01Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-12-05T19:06:01Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018-11 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/21098 | |
| dc.publisher | Université de Montréal. Département de sciences économiques. | fr |
| dc.subject | Just noticeable difference | fr |
| dc.subject | Semi-order | fr |
| dc.subject | Luce choice axiom | fr |
| dc.subject | Strict utility model | fr |
| dc.subject | Imperfect utility discrimination | fr |
| dc.title | Threshold Luce rules | fr |
| dc.type | Article | fr |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | Université de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département de sciences économiques | |
| dcterms.abstract | In the late 1950’s, Luce proposed two different theories of imperfect utility discrimination that have had a lasting impact on economics. One model (1956) gave rise to the literature on just noticeable differences while the other (1959) laid the foundations for the literature on discrete choice. In this paper, I present a unified model of imperfect utility discrimination that generalizes Luce’s two models; and addresses the main limitations of each. Surprisingly, choice behavior consistent with this model is characterized by two conditions from Luce’s monograph (1959). | fr |
| dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:0709-9231 | |
| dcterms.language | eng | fr |
| UdeM.VersionRioxx | Version publiée / Version of Record | fr |
| oaire.citationTitle | Cahier de recherche | |
| oaire.citationIssue | 2018-17 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.