Organizing time banks: Lessons from matching markets
dc.contributor.author | Andersson, Tommy | |
dc.contributor.author | Cseh, Agnes | |
dc.contributor.author | Ehlers, Lars | |
dc.contributor.author | Erlanson, Albin | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-09-24T18:22:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-09-24T18:22:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-07 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/20920 | |
dc.publisher | Université de Montréal. Département de sciences économiques. | fr |
dc.subject | Market design | fr |
dc.subject | Time banking | fr |
dc.subject | Priority mechanism | fr |
dc.subject | Non-manipulability | fr |
dc.title | Organizing time banks: Lessons from matching markets | fr |
dc.type | Article | fr |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Université de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département de sciences économiques | |
dcterms.abstract | A time bank is a group of people that set up a common platform to trade services among themselves. There are several well-known problems associated with this type of time banking, e.g., high overhead costs and difficulties to identify feasible trades. This paper constructs a non-manipulable mechanism that selects an individually rational and time-balanced allocation which maximizes exchanges among the members of the time bank (and those allocations are efficient). The mechanism works on a domain of preferences where agents classify services as unacceptable and acceptable (and for those services agents have specific upper quotas representing their maximum needs). | fr |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:0709-9231 | |
dcterms.language | eng | fr |
UdeM.VersionRioxx | Version publiée / Version of Record | fr |
oaire.citationTitle | Cahier de recherche | |
oaire.citationIssue | 2018-08 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.