Show item record

dc.contributor.authorHarrington, Matthew
dc.date.accessioned2007-12-11T19:11:28Z
dc.date.available2007-12-11T19:11:28Z
dc.date.issued1994
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/1985
dc.format.extent5627798 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherYale Law & Policy Reviewen
dc.subjectcivil forfeiture, in rem
dc.titleRethinking in Rem: The Supreme Court's New (And Misguided) Approach to Civil Forfeitureen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté de droitfr
dcterms.description[À l'origine dans / Was originally part of : Fac. Droit - Coll. facultaire - Droit constitutionnel et Libertés publiques]fr
dcterms.languageengen
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscript
oaire.citationTitleYale law and policy review
oaire.citationVolume12
oaire.citationIssue2
oaire.citationStartPage281
oaire.citationEndPage354


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.