Show item record

dc.contributor.authorBahel, Éric
dc.contributor.authorSprumont, Yves
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-31T17:50:03Z
dc.date.available2017-05-31T17:50:03Z
dc.date.issued2017-05
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/18917
dc.publisherUniversité de Montréal. Département de sciences économiques.fr
dc.subjectSocial choice under uncertaintyfr
dc.subjectStrategyproofnessfr
dc.subjectSubjective expected utilityfr
dc.subjectDictatorshipfr
dc.subjectConsensualityfr
dc.subjectBilateralityfr
dc.titleStrategyproof Choice of Acts : Beyond Dictatorshipfr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département de sciences économiques
dcterms.abstractWe model social choices as acts mapping states of nature to (public) outcomes. A social choice function (or SCF) assigns an act to every profile of subjective expected utility preferences over acts. A SCF is strategyproof if no agent ever has an incentive to misrepresent her beliefs about the states of nature or her valuation of the outcomes; it is ex-post efficient if the act selected at any given preference profile picks a Pareto-efficient outcome in every state of nature. We offer a complete characterization of all strategyproof and ex-post efficient SCFs. The chosen act must pick the most preferred outcome of some (possibly different) agent in every state of nature. The set of states in which an agent's top outcome is selected may vary with the reported belief profile; it is the union of all the states assigned to her by a collection of bilaterally dictatorial and bilaterally consensual assignment rules.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:0709-9231
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion publiée / Version of Record
oaire.citationTitleCahier de recherche
oaire.citationIssue2017-01


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.