Show item record

dc.contributor.authorTremblay, Luc B.
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-15T15:42:12Z
dc.date.available2007-06-15T15:42:12Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.citationTREMBLAY Luc B., « General Legitimacy of Judicial Review and the Fundamental Basis of Constitutional Law », Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 23, No 4 (2003) pp.525-562.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/1376
dc.format.extent292169 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherOxford Journal of Legal Studiesen
dc.titleGeneral Legitimacy of Judicial Review and the Fundamental Basis of Constitutional Lawen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté de droitfr
dcterms.abstractFour questions dominate normative contemporary constitutional theroy: What is the purpose of a constitution? What makes a constitution legitimate? What kinds of arguments are legitimate within the process of constitutional interpretation? What can make judicial review of legislation legitimate in principle? The main purpose of this text is to provide one general answer to the last question. The secondary purpose is to show how this answer may bear upon our understanding of the fundamental basis of constitutional law. These two purposes should suggest particular answers to the first three questions.en
dcterms.description[À l'origine dans / Was originally part of : Fac. Droit - Coll. facultaire - Droit constitutionnel et Libertés publiques]fr
dcterms.languageengen
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscript


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record