Show item record

dc.contributor.advisorSeymour, Michel
dc.contributor.authorSt-Laurent, Guillaume
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-20T15:54:21Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen
dc.date.available2011-04-20T15:54:21Z
dc.date.issued2011-03-03
dc.date.submitted2010-08
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/4902
dc.subjectsécularisationen
dc.subjectdialectiqueen
dc.subjectherméneutiqueen
dc.subjectnaturalismeen
dc.subjectfoien
dc.subjectrationalitéen
dc.subjectréalismeen
dc.subjectconstructivismeen
dc.subjectmétaéthiqueen
dc.subjecttranscendantalen
dc.subjectSecularizationen
dc.subjectDialecticen
dc.subjectHermeneuticen
dc.subjectNaturalismen
dc.subjectFaithen
dc.subjectRationalityen
dc.subjectRealismen
dc.subjectConstructivismen
dc.subjectMetaethicsen
dc.subjectTranscendentalen
dc.subject.otherPhilosophy / Philosophie (UMI : 0422)en
dc.titleDialectique et sécularisation chez Charles Tayloren
dc.typeThèse ou mémoire / Thesis or Dissertation
etd.degree.disciplinePhilosophieen
etd.degree.grantorUniversité de Montréalfr
etd.degree.levelMaîtrise / Master'sen
etd.degree.nameM.A.en
dcterms.abstractL’objectif central du présent mémoire consiste à interroger les implications générales de l’interprétation taylorienne de la sécularisation, telle que déployée dans ‘A Secular Age’ (2007), pour la philosophie de la religion. Nous soutenons que l’approche herméneutique de notre auteur, reposant sur son anthropologie philosophique, a pour effet d’arrimer de façon indissociable et originale le problème de la sécularisation avec le questionnement philosophique sur la religion. À cet effet, nous présentons la critique du naturalisme déployée par Taylor ainsi que les grandes lignes de sa ‘dialectique’ afin de clarifier l’orientation générale de sa démarche. Nous passons ensuite à une analyse de son interprétation de la sécularisation ainsi que des implications de cette dernière pour les questions constitutives de la philosophie de la religion, touchant notamment la nature de la religion, le statut épistémologique des croyances religieuses, les rapports entre foi et raison ainsi que la relation entre la religion et la science moderne. Nous terminons sur un ton plus critique en interrogeant le ‘réalisme métaéthique’ de notre auteur et en soutenant que sa position pourrait constituer la base d’un ‘récit soustractif’ plus robuste et pénétrant.en
dcterms.abstractThe central aim of this work is to assess the most general implications of the interpretation of secularization by Charles Taylor, as it is deployed in ‘A Secular Age’ (2007), for the domain of philosophy of religion. We argue that the hermeneutical approach of Taylor, resting on his philosophical anthropology, binds together in an original and indivisible fashion the problem of secularization and the philosophical reflection on religion. To this effect, I describe his critique of naturalism and the broad lines of his ‘dialectic’ in order to clarify the general orientation of his work. I then move to an analysis of his interpretation of secularization and its implications for the constitutive questions in philosophy of religion, notably regarding the nature of religion, the epistemological status of religious beliefs, the relations between faith and reason as well as between religion and modern science. I conclude on a more critical note with an examination of the ‘metaethical realism’ of our author and by showing that his position might best be understood as the basis for a deepened and reinforced ‘subtraction story’.en
dcterms.languagefraen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.