Show item record

dc.contributor.authorGarcia Drigo, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorPiketty, Marie Gabrielle
dc.contributor.authorAbramovay, Ricardo
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-16T13:55:54Z
dc.date.available2010-02-16T13:55:54Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.urihttp://ethique-economique.net/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/3427
dc.publisherCentre de recherche en éthique de l'Université de Montréal
dc.subjectphilosophyen
dc.subjectethicsen
dc.subjecteconomicsen
dc.subjectBrazilen
dc.subjectenvironmental certificationen
dc.subjectcommunity-based forest managementen
dc.titleCertification of community-based forest enterprises (CFEs): limits of the Brazilian experiencesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Centre de recherche en éthiquefr
dcterms.abstractThe Brazilian Amazon is one of the world’s largest tropical forests. It supplies more than 80 % of Brazil’s timber production and makes this nation the second largest producer of tropical wood. The forestry sector is of major importance in terms of economic production and employment creation. However, the Brazilian Amazon is also known for its high deforestation rate and for its rather unsustainably managed timber resources, a fact which puts in the balance the long-term future of the forestry sector in the region. Since the mid- 1990s, with strong support from World Wildlife Fund (WWF), the number of tropical forests certified by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) has significantly increased. This is especially true for projects sponsored by large scale companies. The number of community- based forest management projects has also increased. Certification of community-based forest enterprises (CFEs) was initially a goal for the sponsors and community members. Certification is viewed as a way to reach alternative timber markets. In Brazil, the state of Acre has the highest concentration of CFEs certified by FSC. Most of them have been implemented with the support of environmental NGOs and public funds. Environmental NGOs strongly defend the advantages of certification for communities; however, in reality, this option is not that advantageous. Despite all the efforts, the number of participants in each project remains low. Why is this occurring? In this paper, we analyze the underlying motives of a few individual’s participation in CFEs certification projects. We aim to present and discuss some factors that shape the success of CFEs and their later certification. The results are based on surveys conducted in two certified CFEs in the state of Acre.en
dcterms.abstractL’Amazonie Brésilienne, l’un des plus grands massifs forestiers mondiaux, est à l’origine de 80 % de la production de bois du Brésil. Les taux de déforestation élevés (malgré un certain ralentissement ces dernières années) et le rythme d’exploitation peu durable des ressources remettent en cause la pérennité du secteur forestier dans la région. Depuis le début des années 1990, avec le soutien du WWF, le nombre d’entreprises forestières certifiées par le FSC (Forest Stewardship Council) a considérablement augmenté dans le domaine privé. C’est aussi le cas, mais dans une très moindre mesure, de l’exploitation forestière communautaire, en particulier dans l’Etat de l’Acre. Les ONGs défendent de manière générale les multiples avantages de ce type de certification pour les communautés vivant en Amazonie. Pourtant, en dépit des multiples incitations financées à fonds perdus, le taux d’adhésion des communautés locales reste faible. Cet article analyse les facteurs responsables de la faible participation des populations aux projets de certification de l’exploitation communautaire des forêts. L’analyse est basée sur des enquêtes de terrains menées au sein de deux communautés forestières de l’Etat de l’Acre certifiées par le FSC.en
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1639-1306
dcterms.languageengen
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion publiée / Version of Record
oaire.citationTitleÉthique et économique = Ethics and economics
oaire.citationVolume6
oaire.citationIssue2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.