Market failure, inequality and redistribution
dc.contributor.author | Jean-Marie, Dufour | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-02-15T20:27:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-02-15T20:27:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://ethique-economique.net | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/3420 | |
dc.publisher | Centre de recherche en éthique de l'Université de Montréal | |
dc.subject | philosophy | en |
dc.subject | ethics | en |
dc.subject | economics | en |
dc.subject | positive economics | en |
dc.subject | normative economics | en |
dc.subject | welfare economics | en |
dc.subject | market failure | en |
dc.subject | externality | en |
dc.subject | taxation | en |
dc.subject | social choice | en |
dc.subject | public choice | en |
dc.title | Market failure, inequality and redistribution | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Université de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Centre de recherche en éthique | fr |
dcterms.abstract | We consider the following question: does market failure justify redistribution? We argue that the general answer to this question is no, in the sense that policies for correcting market failures do not aim at producing a "desirable" income distribution. This follows from the fact that, by construction, market failure is a deviation from "efficiency" that does not involve any notion of a desirable distribution of welfare (or income). However, there are special cases where a "corrective measure" involving redistribution can offset a market failure, so this can provide a form of efficiency- based justification for redistribution. | en |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:1639-1306 | |
dcterms.language | eng | en |
UdeM.VersionRioxx | Version publiée / Version of Record | |
oaire.citationTitle | Éthique et économique = Ethics and economics | |
oaire.citationVolume | 6 | |
oaire.citationIssue | 1 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.