Show item record

dc.contributor.authorMacleod, Colin
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-03T14:41:38Z
dc.date.available2010-02-03T14:41:38Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.urihttp://ethique-economique.net/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/3336
dc.publisherCentre de recherche en éthique de l'Université de Montréal
dc.subjectPhilosophyen
dc.subjectEthicsen
dc.subjectEconomicsen
dc.titleEconomic Incentives and Liberal Equalityen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Centre de recherche en éthiquefr
dcterms.abstractIn order to assess to the degree to which the provision of economic incentives can result in justified inequalities, we need to distinguish between compensatory incentive payments and non-compensatory incentive payments. From a liberal egalitarian perspective, economic inequalities traceable to the provision of compensatory incentive payments are generally justifiable. However, economic inequalities created by the provision of non-compensatory incentive payments are more problematic. I argue that in non-ideal circumstances justice may permit and even require the provision of non-compensatory incentives despite the fact that those who receive non-compensatory payments are not entitled to them. In some circumstances, justice may require us to accede to unreasonable demands for incentive payments by hard bargainers. This leads to a kind of paradox: from a systemic point of view, non-compensatory incentive payments can be justified even though those who receive them have no just claim to them.en
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1639-1306
dcterms.languageengen
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion publiée / Version of Record
oaire.citationTitleÉthique et économique = Ethics and economics
oaire.citationVolume3
oaire.citationIssue1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.