Human rights in Shari'a and Iran's constitutional and legal system : the case of freedom of expression
dc.contributor.advisor | Tremblay, André | |
dc.contributor.author | Eslami Somea, Reza | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-28T17:28:14Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | fr |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-28T17:28:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2001-11-01 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2001-04 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/33289 | |
dc.subject | Charia | fr |
dc.subject | Droits de l'homme | fr |
dc.subject | Égalité | fr |
dc.subject | Droits des femmes | fr |
dc.subject | Liberté d'expression | fr |
dc.subject | Iran | fr |
dc.subject | Dialogue interculturel | fr |
dc.subject | Dignité humaine | fr |
dc.subject.other | Law / Droit (UMI : 0398) | fr |
dc.title | Human rights in Shari'a and Iran's constitutional and legal system : the case of freedom of expression | fr |
dc.type | Thèse ou mémoire / Thesis or Dissertation | |
etd.degree.discipline | Droit | fr |
etd.degree.grantor | Université de Montréal | |
etd.degree.level | Doctorat / Doctoral | fr |
etd.degree.name | LL. D. | fr |
dcterms.abstract | This thesis advances a theoretical framework for the evaluation of Shari'a (Islamic law) with respect to the modern notion of international human rights law. It analyzes the concepts of individual, rights, citizenry, and constitutionalism in Shari'a, and examines the principles, characteristics, and standards of Shari'a in the field of human rights. With reference to the principle of equality, it also reviews the rights of women and religious minorities under Shari'a. As a case study, the thesis also establishes a framework for analyzing the notions of freedom and freedom of expression, and discusses Shari'a criteria and qualifications for freedom of speech, the right to participate in public life, freedom of thought, conscience and religion, and freedom of the press. Focusing on Iran's constitutional and legal system, the study illustrates the implementation of Islamic law in Iran, where Shari'a is strictly applied. The thesis concludes that universal standards of human rights are not established features in Islamic law, and Shari'a principles contradict the principles and norms of international human rights law. It is also argued that the application of Shari'a, public and criminal law in particular, is problematic and results in deficiencies and hardships in Muslim societies. Muslim reformists have sought an alternative Islamic law more compatible with modern standards and values. This thesis contributes to the debate on Islamic reformism and human rights in arguing that Shari'a's contradiction of universal human rights norms cannot be avoided, and that traditional mechanisms of reforrn within the framework of Shari'a are inadequate for achieving the necessary degree of reform. It is suggested that, based on a cross-cultural dialogue and intellectual debate, an essential and primary reform should define the notion of human rights on rational and intellectual grounds, and identify the objective foundations of human rights in reason and human dignity, not on Shari'a criteria and qualifications. | fr |
dcterms.description | Thèse numérisée par la Direction des bibliothèques de l’Université de Montréal | fr |
dcterms.language | eng | fr |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.