Paying for Higher Education: Are Top-Up Fees Fair?
| dc.contributor.author | Brighouse, Harry | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-01-22T21:38:03Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-01-22T21:38:03Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2004 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://ethique-economique.net/ | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/3299 | |
| dc.publisher | Centre de recherche en éthique de l'Université de Montréal | |
| dc.subject | Philosophy | en |
| dc.subject | Ethics | en |
| dc.subject | Economics | en |
| dc.title | Paying for Higher Education: Are Top-Up Fees Fair? | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | Université de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Centre de recherche en éthique | fr |
| dcterms.abstract | This paper considers four institutional models for funding higher education in the light of principles of fairness and meritocracy, with particular reference to the debate in the UK over ‘top-up fees’. It concludes that, under certain plausible but unproven assumptions, the model the UK government has adopted is fairer and more meritocratic than alternatives, including, surprisingly, the Graduate Tax. | en |
| dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:1639-1306 | |
| dcterms.language | eng | en |
| UdeM.VersionRioxx | Version publiée / Version of Record | |
| oaire.citationTitle | Éthique et économique = Ethics and economics | |
| oaire.citationVolume | 2 | |
| oaire.citationIssue | 1 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.