Show item record

dc.contributor.authorCamarda, Aldo Joseph
dc.contributor.authorMilot, Patrice
dc.contributor.authorCiaburro, Hugo
dc.contributor.authorRompré, Pierre
dc.contributor.authorSallaleh, Imad
dc.contributor.authorDo, Cao Minh Alexandre
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-02T16:51:37Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2021-07-02T16:51:37Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/25329
dc.publisherQuintessence International Publishing Groupfr
dc.subjectAcid-etched fixturefr
dc.subjectMachined collar designfr
dc.subjectProspective studyfr
dc.titleLong-term randomized clinical trial evaluating the effects of fixture surface acid-etching and machined collar design on bone healingfr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté de médecine dentairefr
dc.identifier.doi10.3290/j.qi.a41013
dcterms.abstractObjectives: An implant with an acid-etched fixture surface and internal-hex collar may achieve greater osseointegration. The goal of this research was to study the effects on long-term bone healing of fixture surface acid-etching and machined collar design. Method and materials: Three two-part implant types were compared: standard Brånemark (with an external-hex 1.2 mm long machined flat collar), Swede-Vent (a copy of the Brånemark design, with an identical collar but a fixture surface acid-etched to 1 to 3 µm), and Screw-Vent (with a fixture surface acid-etched identically to that of Swede-Vent, but a longer internal-hex machined flat collar that did not require countersinking). Fifty-eight subjects each received the three types in alternate fashion at five sites between mental foramen, and a fixed full-arch prosthesis. Abutment-implant interface/microgap (MG) was placed at the crest, and first bone-to-implant contact point-to microgap (fBIC-MG) was measured at mesial and distal sides of each implant. Mean fBIC-MG values were compared after 15 to 20 years of function. Statistical analysis was based on the mixed linear model with the level of significance set at P < .05 and Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparisons. Results: Brånemark had less mean marginal bone loss (-1.08 mm, standard error [SE] 0.20) compared with Swede-Vent (-1.28 mm, SE 0.20), but pairwise comparisons showed that the difference was not statistically significant (mean difference of 0.20 mm, P = .662). Screw-Vent had the greatest loss (-1.92 mm, SE 0.20), and pairwise comparisons showed that the difference was statistically significant compared with Brånemark and Swede-Vent (difference ≥ 0.64 mm, P < .001). Conclusion: According to accepted standards for osseointegration, all three implant types achieved very acceptable long-term results. However, while Brånemark had the least bone loss, the implant with the acid-etched fixture surface and longer internal-hex collar design had the greatest loss. Within the confines of this study, shorter collar length of 1.2 mm may be more important to limit long-term bone loss with microgap placed at the crest.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1936-7163fr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposantdoi:10.3290/j.qi.a41013fr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion publiée / Version of Recordfr
oaire.citationTitleQuintessence internationalfr
oaire.citationVolume49fr
oaire.citationIssue9fr
oaire.citationStartPage733fr
oaire.citationEndPage743fr


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.