dc.contributor.author | Leclerc, Alexia | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-18T11:45:20Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | fr |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-18T11:45:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/25018 | |
dc.publisher | Société Philosophique Ithaque | fr |
dc.rights | Ce document est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons
Attribution - Pas d’utilisation commerciale - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 2.5 Canada / This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike 2.5 Canada | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ca/deed.fr | |
dc.title | Impartiality as an epistemic privilege | fr |
dc.type | Article | fr |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Université de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département de philosophie | fr |
dcterms.abstract | In this article, I will examine the phenomenon wherein white people feel that they can be impartial in discussions about racism. Specifically, I will argue that the experience of whiteness confers the belief that one can be impartial, that manifests itself in the appearance of an epistemic privilege. The phenomenological experience of whiteness is constituted in such a way as to ignore the racialized experience. Moreover, white people have privileged access to the majority’s hermeneutic resources, as these reflect and build upon this whiteness. In this regard, I will analyse the white and racialized phenomenological experiences and examine their epistemic consequences to show how impartiality can be conceived as a white epistemic privilege. | fr |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:1703-1001 | fr |
dcterms.language | fra | fr |
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposant | Ithaque ; no. 28, pp. 1-17. | fr |
UdeM.VersionRioxx | Version publiée / Version of Record | fr |
oaire.citationTitle | Ithaque | fr |
oaire.citationIssue | 28 (printemps 2021) | fr |
oaire.citationStartPage | 1 | fr |
oaire.citationEndPage | 17 | fr |