Show item record

dc.contributor.authorCyr, J.
dc.contributor.authorTurcotte, Marie-Ève
dc.contributor.authorDesrosiers, A.
dc.contributor.authorBélanger, Denise
dc.contributor.authorHarel, Josée
dc.contributor.authorTremblay, Donald
dc.contributor.authorLeboeuf, Anne
dc.contributor.authorGagnon, Carl A.
dc.contributor.authorCôté, J.-C.
dc.contributor.authorArsenault, Julie
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-05T12:48:59Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2021-05-05T12:48:59Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-02
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/24979
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressfr
dc.rightsCe document est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Paternité 4.0 International. / This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.fr
dc.subjectCatsfr
dc.subjectCoxiella burnetiifr
dc.subjectPrevalencefr
dc.subjectRisk factorsfr
dc.titlePrevalence of Coxiella burnetii seropositivity and shedding in farm, pet and feral cats and associated risk factors in farm cats in Quebec, Canadafr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté de médecine vétérinairefr
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0950268821000364
dcterms.abstractCats represent a potential source of Coxiella burnetii, the aetiological agent of Q fever in humans. The prevalence and risk factors of C. burnetii infection in farm, pet and feral cats were studied in Quebec, Canada, using a cross-sectional study. Serum samples were tested using a specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the presence of antibodies against C. burnetii, whereas rectal swabs were assayed using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for the molecular detection of the bacteria. Potential risk factors for farm cats were investigated using clinical examinations, questionnaires and results from a concurrent study on C. burnetii farm status. A total of 184 cats were tested: 59 from ruminant farms, 73 pets and 52 feral cats. Among farm cats, 2/59 (3.4%) were ELISA-positive, 3/59 (5.1%) were ELISA-doubtful and 1/59 (1.7%) was qPCR-positive. All pets and feral cats were negative to C. burnetii ELISA and qPCR. Farm cat positivity was associated with a positive C. burnetii status on the ruminant farm (prevalence ratio = 7.6, P = 0.03). Our results suggest that although pet and feral cats do not seem to pose a great C. burnetii risk to public health, more active care should be taken when in contact with cats from ruminant farms.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:0950-2688fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1469-4409fr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposantCyr J, Turcotte MÈ, Desrosiers A, Bélanger D, Harel J, Tremblay D, Leboeuf A, Gagnon CA, Côté JC, Arsenault J. Prevalence of Coxiella burnetii seropositivity and shedding in farm, pet and feral cats and associated risk factors in farm cats in Quebec, Canada. Epidemiol Infect. 2021 Feb 15;149:e57. doi: 10.1017/S0950268821000364. PMID: 33583452.fr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion publiée / Version of Recordfr
oaire.citationTitleEpidemiology and infectionfr
oaire.citationVolume149fr


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

Ce document est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons 
Paternité 4.0 International. / This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 
International License.
Usage rights : Ce document est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Paternité 4.0 International. / This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.