Show item record

dc.contributor.authorPiché, Claude
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-28T18:48:56Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONfr
dc.date.available2019-01-28T18:48:56Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/21410
dc.publisherDe Gruyterfr
dc.subjectEarthfr
dc.subjectPeacefr
dc.subjectPublic law of peoplesfr
dc.subjectState of nation statesfr
dc.titleLa rotondité de la Terre : une chance pour la paixfr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département de philosophiefr
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/kant-2015-0037
dcterms.abstractIn his Doctrine of Right (1797), Kant claims that all three components of public law must be realized if perpetual peace is to be achieved: state law, the law of peoples, and cosmopolitan law. In their accounts of Kant’s cosmopolitan law, commentators have noted Kant’s remark that the Earth is not an infinite plane surface, but a globe. A close reading of section 43 shows, however, that the sphericity of the Earth is also a condition of the possibility of Kant’s new state law of peoples (Völkerstaatsrecht), a law oriented toward the ideal of a ‘global’ state of nation states (Völkerstaat). This means that the closed political space of the Earth, which is a purely contingent condition, had a decisive impact on Kant’s threefold conception of public law.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1613-1134fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:0022-8877fr
dcterms.languagefrafr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposantKant-Studien = ISSN 0022-8877 p. 371-397fr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion originale de l'auteur·e / Author's Originalfr
oaire.citationTitleKant-studien
oaire.citationVolume106
oaire.citationIssue3
oaire.citationStartPage371
oaire.citationEndPage397


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.