Abstract(s)
The aim of this paper is to set out some features of Kant’s conception of transcendental
philosophy. I would like to argue that this philosophy, although it is situated at a higher level of
discourse than common knowledge, does not essentially transcend the limits that it sets to this
knowledge. In order to achieve this, I stress the fact that Kant regards experience as a mere
“possibility.” Now, the Critique of Pure Reason explains that the human understanding cannot
conceive of an absolute possibility, but only a relative one, namely a possibility that is tied to
conditions. And possible experience as a whole is no exception here. Hence the expression
“conditions of the possibility of experience” which designates the topic of the Transcendental
Analytic. This also means that experience is “contingent” (A 737/B 765). It is not in itself
necessary; rather, it is dependent upon certain conditions. But then we learn that the most
important transcendental conditions for this experience, i.e., the dynamic principles, are
themselves “contingent” (A 160/B 199). Consequently, these transcendental conditions are not
unconditioned; they in turn depend on empirical conditions, over which they have no control.