A Case Study on Citation Accuracy: The Letter That “Became" a Research Article
dc.contributor.author | Clar, Monique | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-07-04T12:38:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-07-04T12:38:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-05 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/18934 | |
dc.subject | Bibliométrie | fr |
dc.subject | Irrelevant citations | fr |
dc.title | A Case Study on Citation Accuracy: The Letter That “Became" a Research Article | fr |
dc.type | Contribution à un congrès / Conference object | fr |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Université de Montréal. Direction des bibliothèques | fr |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.7939/R30V89V6B | |
dcterms.abstract | Since its publication in 2006, a two-paragraph letter by Handoll H.H. on the need for Cochrane reviews on rehabilitation interventions has been repeatedly cited, erroneously, in meta-analyses of genetic risk factors as a reference for the Q test for heterogeneity. In order to understand how this error started, evolved and lasted throughout the years, a citation and publication analysis of the citing articles was done. | fr |
dcterms.description | Également publié dans : Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association; vol. 38, no 2 | |
dcterms.language | eng | fr |
oaire.citationTitle | Association des bibliothèques de la santé du Canada. Congrès annuel |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.