Efficient Priority Rules
dc.contributor.author | Ehlers, Lars | |
dc.contributor.author | Klaus, Bettina | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-09-22T19:56:22Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-09-22T19:56:22Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1866/502 | |
dc.format.extent | 166216 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.publisher | Université de Montréal. Département de sciences économiques. | fr |
dc.subject | acyclical priority structures | |
dc.subject | indivisible objects | |
dc.subject | [JEL:D63] Microeconomics - Welfare Economics - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement | en |
dc.subject | [JEL:D70] Microeconomics - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - General | en |
dc.subject | [JEL:D63] Microéconomie - Économie du bien-être - Egalité, justice, inégalité et autres critères normatifs et mesures | fr |
dc.subject | [JEL:D70] Microéconomie - Analyse de prise de décision collective - Généralités | fr |
dc.title | Efficient Priority Rules | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Université de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Département de sciences économiques | |
dcterms.abstract | We study the assignment of indivisible objects with quotas (houses, jobs, or offices) to a set of agents (students, job applicants, or professors). Each agent receives at most one object and monetary compensations are not possible. We characterize efficient priority rules by efficiency, strategy-proofness, and reallocation-consistency. Such a rule respects an acyclical priority structure and the allocations can be determined using the deferred acceptance algorithm. | |
dcterms.isPartOf | urn:ISSN:0709-9231 | |
UdeM.VersionRioxx | Version publiée / Version of Record | |
oaire.citationTitle | Cahier de recherche | |
oaire.citationIssue | 2003-13 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.