Show item record

dc.contributor.authorVarone, Frédéric
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-23T18:24:56Z
dc.date.available2010-01-23T18:24:56Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.urihttp://ethique-economique.net/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/3303
dc.publisherCentre de recherche en éthique de l'Université de Montréal
dc.subjectPhilosophyen
dc.subjectEthicsen
dc.subjectEconomicsen
dc.titleL’accès gratuit à l’eau potable bénéficie-t-il nécessairement au plus défavorisé ? Une discussion critique à l’aune du cas de la Flandreen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. Centre de recherche en éthiquefr
dcterms.abstractThis article discusses the 1997 Flemish reform in the domestic water sector (Belgium). It abolished a previously existing social correction of the wastewater charge. Instead, a tax exemption for some disadvantaged categories was introduced. Moreover, water consumers receive 15 m3 of drinking-water per person per year for free. This policy change was assumed to contribute better to social equity. However, the reform led to changes in the drinking water tariffs by the water companies. Furthermore, a study conducted by Van Humbeeck (1998) shows that the distributive impact of the new water regulation is negative. As a matter of fact, the water reform increased the regressivity of the total wastewater and drinking water expenses. The Flemish example shows that ex ante evaluation of any reform of public services is a prerequisite for more social justice in the provision of basic goods to underprivileged citizens.en
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1639-1306
dcterms.languagefraen
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion publiée / Version of Record
oaire.citationTitleÉthique et économique = Ethics and economics
oaire.citationVolume2
oaire.citationIssue1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.