Show item record

dc.contributor.authorGagnon, François
dc.contributor.authorHuynh, Christophe
dc.contributor.authorKilborn, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorFry, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorVallée, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorJanezic, Isidora
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-02T12:57:58Z
dc.date.availableMONTHS_WITHHELD:12fr
dc.date.available2022-05-02T12:57:58Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-25
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1866/26636
dc.publisherWileyfr
dc.subjectBylawsfr
dc.subjectCanadafr
dc.subjectCannabisfr
dc.subjectDensityfr
dc.subjectLand-usefr
dc.subjectLegalizationfr
dc.subjectLocalizationfr
dc.subjectMunicipalitiesfr
dc.subjectOutletfr
dc.subjectPublic consumptionfr
dc.subjectRetailerfr
dc.subjectStorefr
dc.titleMunicipal regulation of cannabis and public health in Canada : a comparison of Alberta, Ontario, and Québecfr
dc.typeArticlefr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté des arts et des sciences. École de psychoéducationfr
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montréal. Faculté de médecine. Département de psychiatrie et d'addictologiefr
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/bsl.2572
dcterms.abstractCanada legalized nonmedical cannabis in October 2018, but significant variations in municipal regulations exist. This study explored the variations that exist and pondered their potential public health consequences. A comparative analysis was completed on the regulations and guidelines that addressed retailers' location and public consumption in the municipalities of Alberta, Ontario, and Québec. Municipal regulations that addressed the location of retailers were more numerous and extensive in Alberta and Ontario (in the context of provincial private retail models) than in Québec (government-based model). Municipalities in Alberta added more restrictions to public consumption laws as compared to municipalities in Ontario and in Québec. These additions were made to Alberta's and Ontario's provincial-level smoking and vaping bans which used tobacco-inspired frameworks, and to Québec's ban on smoking and vaping in all public spaces. The comparative analysis showed the importance of considering municipal cannabis regulations when studying the impact of legalization, given the significant variations that exist. Policy makers should be made aware of these variations in the regulation of cannabis in order to limit health harms and further social inequalities.fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN: 0735-3936fr
dcterms.isPartOfurn:ISSN:1099-0798fr
dcterms.languageengfr
UdeM.ReferenceFournieParDeposantGagnon, F., Huynh, C., Kilborn, M., Fry, M., Vallée, R., & Janezic, I. (2022). Municipal regulation of cannabis and public health in Canada: A comparison of Alberta, Ontario, and Québec. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2572fr
UdeM.VersionRioxxVersion acceptée / Accepted Manuscriptfr
oaire.citationTitleBehavioral sciences and the lawfr


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show item record

This document disseminated on Papyrus is the exclusive property of the copyright holders and is protected by the Copyright Act (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42). It may be used for fair dealing and non-commercial purposes, for private study or research, criticism and review as provided by law. For any other use, written authorization from the copyright holders is required.